Compare Financial Times vs Future Science Group BETA

See how working at Financial Times vs. Future Science Group compares on a variety of workplace factors. By comparing employers on employee ratings, salaries, reviews, pros/cons, job openings and more, you'll feel one step ahead of the rest. All salaries and reviews are posted by employees working at Financial Times vs. Future Science Group. Learn more about each company and apply to jobs near you.
Financial Times company icon

Financial Times

Employee Ratings

  • Financial Times scored higher in 8 areas: Overall Rating, Career Opportunities, Compensation & Benefits, Work-life balance, Senior Management, Culture & Values, % Recommend to a friend and Positive Business Outlook.
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
4.0
(based on 290 reviews)
Financial Times employees rated their Overall Rating 1.0 higher than Future Science Group employees rated theirs.
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
3.0
(based on 19 reviews)
Career Opportunities
Career Opportunities
3.3
Financial Times employees rated their Career Opportunities 0.6 higher than Future Science Group employees rated theirs.
Career Opportunities
2.7
Compensation & Benefits
Compensation & Benefits
3.6
Financial Times employees rated their Compensation & Benefits 1.5 higher than Future Science Group employees rated theirs.
Compensation & Benefits
2.1
Work-life balance
Work-life balance
4.3
Financial Times employees rated their Work-life balance 1.0 higher than Future Science Group employees rated theirs.
Work-life balance
3.3
Senior Management
Senior Management
3.4
Financial Times employees rated their Senior Management 0.4 higher than Future Science Group employees rated theirs.
Senior Management
3.0
Culture & Values
Culture & Values
4.2
Financial Times employees rated their Culture & Values 1.1 higher than Future Science Group employees rated theirs.
Culture & Values
3.1
CEO Approval
CEO Approval
Financial Times Ceo John Ridding
98%
98%John Ridding
CEO Approval
Future Science Group placeholder CEO image
N/A0 Ratings
% Recommend to a friend
% Recommend to a friend
82%
Financial Times employees rated their % Recommend to a friend 22% higher than Future Science Group employees rated theirs.
% Recommend to a friend
60%
Positive Business Outlook
Positive Business Outlook
67%
Financial Times employees rated their Positive Business Outlook 28% higher than Future Science Group employees rated theirs.
Positive Business Outlook
39%

Salaries

Financial Times has 270 more total submitted salaries than Future Science Group.
Salaries for similar jobs
Salaries for similar jobs
Account Manager9 Salaries
£35,972/yr
Product Manager7 Salaries
£47,197/yr
Reporter6 Salaries
£37,522/yr
Salaries for similar jobs
Commissioning Editor5 Salaries
£22,409/yr

What Employees Say

  • "Work life balance" was the most mentioned Pro at Financial Times.
  • "Career progression" was the most mentioned Con at Financial Times.
Pros
Pros
"Work life balance"(in 43 reviews)
"Great people"(in 19 reviews)
There aren't enough reviews matching this company to generate pros and cons.
Cons
Cons
"Career progression"(in 23 reviews)
"Senior management"(in 12 reviews)
Featured Review
"Great"20 Nov 2020

Former Contractor - Senior Business Analyst

I worked at Financial Times for less than a year

Pros

Friendly people and a great working envrionment

Cons

A lot of people don't do much

Current Employee - Commissioning Editor

I have been working at Future Science Group full-time for less than a year

Pros

Editorial team are great fun Lots of opportunity to learn Friendly office environment Entirely supportive

Cons

Based fairly north in London, which isn't as fun as central.

Job Postings

Financial Times has 70 more recently posted open jobs than Future Science Group.