Compare Financial Times vs Wall Street Journal BETASee how working at Financial Times vs. Wall Street Journal compares on a variety of workplace factors. By comparing employers on employee ratings, salaries, reviews, pros/cons, job openings and more, you'll feel one step ahead of the rest. All salaries and reviews are posted by employees working at Financial Times vs. Wall Street Journal. Learn more about each company and apply to jobs near you.
- Financial Times scored higher in 9 areas: Overall Rating, Career Opportunities, Compensation & Benefits, Work-life balance, Senior Management, Culture & Values, CEO Approval, % Recommend to a friend and Positive Business Outlook.
What Employees Say
- "Work life balance" was the most mentioned Pro at Financial Times.
- "Journalism" was the most mentioned Pro at Wall Street Journal.
- "Career progression" was the most mentioned Con at Financial Times.
- "Editors" was the most mentioned Con at Wall Street Journal.
I have been working at Wall Street Journal full-time for more than a year
- Editors put in the time to make sure work is of the highest quality - Authoritative take on the news - Strives to be the best
- Hyper focused on feeding U.S. readers. Despite decently-sized bureaus in London and elsewhere , it's hard to push through international news - Too many editors having a say on a story makes them... stilted
Advice to Management
Give writers more freedom to write with a voice. Don't over-cook stories or they lose their energy. Allow more foreign stories to help grow international readership.