Compare Lockheed Martin vs General Atomics BETA

See how working at Lockheed Martin vs. General Atomics compares on a variety of workplace factors. By comparing employers on employee ratings, salaries, reviews, pros/cons, job openings and more, you'll feel one step ahead of the rest. All salaries and reviews are posted by employees working at Lockheed Martin vs. General Atomics. Learn more about each company and apply to jobs near you.
Lockheed Martin company icon

Lockheed Martin

General Atomics company icon

General Atomics

Employee Ratings

  • Lockheed Martin scored higher in 8 areas: Overall Rating, Career Opportunities, Work-life balance, Senior Management, Culture & Values, CEO Approval, % Recommend to a friend and Positive Business Outlook.
  • Both tied in 1 area: Compensation & Benefits.
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
4.0
(based on 6946 reviews)
Lockheed Martin employees rated their Overall Rating 0.3 higher than General Atomics employees rated theirs.
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
3.7
(based on 913 reviews)
Career Opportunities
Career Opportunities
4.0
Lockheed Martin employees rated their Career Opportunities 0.6 higher than General Atomics employees rated theirs.
Career Opportunities
3.4
Compensation & Benefits
Compensation & Benefits
3.9
Compensation & Benefits
3.9
Work-life balance
Work-life balance
4.0
Work-life balance
3.9
Senior Management
Senior Management
3.5
Lockheed Martin employees rated their Senior Management 0.5 higher than General Atomics employees rated theirs.
Senior Management
3.0
Culture & Values
Culture & Values
3.8
Lockheed Martin employees rated their Culture & Values 0.5 higher than General Atomics employees rated theirs.
Culture & Values
3.3
CEO Approval
CEO Approval
Lockheed Martin Ceo James D. Taiclet
92%
92%James D. Taiclet
Lockheed Martin employees rated their CEO Approval 8% higher than General Atomics employees rated theirs.
CEO Approval
General Atomics Ceo Neal Blue
84%
84%Neal Blue
% Recommend to a friend
% Recommend to a friend
81%
Lockheed Martin employees rated their % Recommend to a friend 12% higher than General Atomics employees rated theirs.
% Recommend to a friend
69%
Positive Business Outlook
Positive Business Outlook
77%
Lockheed Martin employees rated their Positive Business Outlook 24% higher than General Atomics employees rated theirs.
Positive Business Outlook
53%

Salaries

Lockheed Martin has 178 more total submitted salaries than General Atomics.
Salaries for similar jobs
Salaries for similar jobs
Graduate Engineer7 Salaries
£28,751/yr
Manager2 Salaries
£57,114/yr
Executive Assistant3 Salaries
£33,701/yr
Salaries for similar jobs
Engineer1 Salaries
29,973/yr
Director of Performance1 Salaries
£21,822/yr
Land Surveyor Engineer1 Salaries
£10,889/mo

What Employees Say

  • "Work life balance" was the most mentioned Pro at Lockheed Martin.
  • "9 80 work" was the most mentioned Pro at General Atomics.
  • "Large company" was the most mentioned Con at Lockheed Martin.
  • "Military" was the most mentioned Con at General Atomics.
Pros
Pros
"Work life balance"(in 626 reviews)
"Good benefits"(in 407 reviews)
Pros
"9 80 work"(in 103 reviews)
"Great benefits"(in 80 reviews)
Cons
Cons
"Large company"(in 185 reviews)
"Work life balance"(in 140 reviews)
Cons
"Military"(in 29 reviews)
"Upper management"(in 23 reviews)
Featured Review
"Great Company"17 Jan 2021

Current Employee - PMO Analyst

I have been working at Lockheed Martin full-time for more than 3 years

Pros

Flexible working, nice team, work from home

Cons

Certain departments are overworked which has knock on effects on other roles

"Great Company!"24 Apr 2017

I have been working at General Atomics

Pros

Company provides an excellent compensation package including 401k and company funded pension.. team oriented environment. Working at GA felt like I was part of something very important

Cons

Excessive travel has strained work/life balance

Job Postings

Lockheed Martin has 5,262 more recently posted open jobs than General Atomics.