Compare Pearson vs Oxford University Press BETA
See how working at Pearson vs. Oxford University Press compares on a variety of workplace factors. By comparing employers on employee ratings, salaries, reviews, pros/cons, job openings and more, you'll feel one step ahead of the rest. All salaries and reviews are posted by employees working at Pearson vs. Oxford University Press. Learn more about each company and apply to jobs near you.Employee Ratings
- Pearson scored higher in 4 areas: Career Opportunities, Compensation & Benefits, Senior Management and CEO Approval.
- Oxford University Press scored higher in 5 areas: Overall Rating, Work-life balance, Culture & Values, % Recommend to a friend and Positive Business Outlook.


Salaries
What Employees Say
- Pearson had 328 more reviews than Oxford University Press that mentioned "Work life balance" as a Pro.
- "Upper management" was the most mentioned Con at Pearson.
- "Oup" was the most mentioned Con at Oxford University Press.
I worked at Pearson full-time for more than a year
Pros
Pearson was by far the best company I'd worked for, and were it not for COVID-19 changing life circumstances, I would still be there. I thoroughly enjoyed the opportunity to work on hard problems... with smart colleagues all over the world. I don't know if it's just the UK-driven corporate culture and all UK companies are like this, but this experience is something I will treasure for the rest of professional career. Pros: -Pay and benefits were at or above market rate for IT skills in the area -Global footprint, a huge, diverse workforce and an inclusive culture -Focus on talent development and maximizing team capabilities -Collegial, collaborative atmosphere and decent managers and management -Management actively solicits new ideas and is open to engaging, and does not have an authoritarian/top-down approach to 'performance culture' that many US-headquartered companies do
Cons
-Levels of bureaucracy and large organization mean decisions take a while to make -Company will make investments in things without fully thinking through, only to discard later, when more thorough... analysis could have saved time, money, and frustration
Advice to Management
-Leverage the talent you already have, and try to stop the bleeding of redunancies/layoffs -Improve reputation with learners by continuing to adopt 'as a service' models -Consolidate IT... infrastructure and teams running IT from top to bottom -Focus on core platforms that are nimble, with flexible IT teams using cutting-edge tech
I have been working at Oxford University Press full-time for more than 5 years
Pros
Great people, lovely building, super flexible working
Cons
Not much cons but it would be great to see more diversity.