Compare Repsol vs Talisman Energy BETASee how working at Repsol vs. Talisman Energy compares on a variety of workplace factors. By comparing employers on employee ratings, salaries, reviews, pros/cons, job openings and more, you'll feel one step ahead of the rest. All salaries and reviews are posted by employees working at Repsol vs. Talisman Energy. Learn more about each company and apply to jobs near you.
- Repsol scored higher in 6 areas: Overall Rating, Senior Management, Culture & Values, CEO Approval, % Recommend to a friend and Positive Business Outlook.
- Talisman Energy scored higher in 2 areas: Career Opportunities and Compensation & Benefits.
- Both tied in 1 area: Work-life balance.
What Employees Say
- Repsol had 34 more reviews than Talisman Energy that mentioned "Work life balance" as a Pro.
- "Madrid" was the most mentioned Con at Repsol.
- "High turnover" was the most mentioned Con at Talisman Energy.
I have been working at Talisman Energy full-time for less than a year
I work outside of Canada so I do not have much experience with other Canadian companies, but I really like our company's culture. It is a flat organization, relaxed and with a great work-life balance.... Most international colleagues I work with are very nice and polite. I enjoy coming to work every day because I like what I do. It is challenging but fun. There are lots of things to learn. And I used to work more and get paid less in the past, so how can I complain about Talisman?
Talisman cannot offer a long-term career. The possibility of growth is limited depending on the function, unless one is willing to relocate to Canada where the HQ is. There are assets being sold, and... there is an uncertainty about the future due to a possibility of a take-over. But I knew this when I took the job, so it does not bother me as life is unpredictable.
Advice to Management
We are pressured to cut down on G&A and reduce costs even such, for example, as personal development for staff, but then the management continues travelling extensively internationally, including the... first class. How does it make sense? Is the first class really necessary for each flight above 6 hours? Furthermore, the company spends ridiculous amounts on extensive expat contracts and related significant costs and benefits for their managers. Is it really necessary in developed countries where a local work force is available?