Compare The University of North Carolina System vs Duke Clinical Research Institute BETA

See how Duke Clinical Research Institute vs. The University of North Carolina System compare on employee ratings, job openings, CEO approval, business outlook and more.
The University of North Carolina System company icon

The University of North Carolina System

Employee Ratings

Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
3.8
(based on 626 reviews)
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
2.5
(based on 158 reviews)
Career Opportunities
Career Opportunities
3.3
Career Opportunities
2.3
Compensation & Benefits
Compensation & Benefits
2.9
Compensation & Benefits
2.9
Work-life balance
Work-life balance
3.4
Work-life balance
3.4
Senior Management
Senior Management
2.8
Senior Management
2.1
Culture & Values
Culture & Values
3.2
Culture & Values
2.9
CEO Approval
CEO Approval
The University of North Carolina System Ceo Bill Roper
N/ABill Roper
CEO Approval
Duke Clinical Research Institute Ceo Lesley Curtis, PhD
45%
45%Lesley Curtis, PhD
% Recommend to a friend
% Recommend to a friend
76%
% Recommend to a friend
27%
Positive Business Outlook
Positive Business Outlook
38%
Positive Business Outlook
15%

Salaries

Salaries for similar jobs
There are no salaries matching this company.
There are no salaries matching this company.

What Employees Say

Pros
Pros
"Work environment"(in 33 reviews)
"Work life balance"(in 27 reviews)
Pros
"Work life balance"(in 32 reviews)
"Dcri"(in 31 reviews)
Cons
Cons
"Low pay"(in 21 reviews)
"Budget cuts"(in 12 reviews)
Cons
"Dcri"(in 26 reviews)
"Upper management"(in 7 reviews)
Featured Review
"Grader"8 Nov 2017

Former Employee - Anonymous Employee

I worked at The University of North Carolina System part-time

Pros

Nice, friendly, and helpful collegues

Cons

pay is not too great

Former Employee - Department Head

I worked at Duke Clinical Research Institute full-time for more than 5 years

Pros

Dedicated researchers with world class clinicians. Excellent opportunity to make a difference in research that improves health.

Cons

Poor leadership and no support from School of Medicine brass. No one held accountable when fraud occurs.

Advice to Management

Remove top management at DCRI and SOM to restore credibility with clients. In downward cycle that will continue with poor or inexperience leaders. Clients, faculty, and staff leaving.

Job Postings