AIG Reviews

Cons

-Hierarchy can be fuzzy at times
-Collaborations can be slow

Cons

Did not have any issues

Cons

Huge company, sometimes as a tech analyst you definitely realise you’re nothing but a supporting function to insurance business. Tasks and work can be tedious and just spreadsheets.

Cons

Career progression and never any salary increases

Cons

Depending on team, could be quite intense

Cons

Old systems, not much investment in IT, too many systems.
Teams work in silos, too much politics between the teams.
Management do not listen to their employees and the employees have to deal with their poor decisions and mistakes.
Managers too concerned about their careers rather than teams - in general if you are useful in their career progression due to skills then you are fine, the moment they don't need you get sidelined and not even get a thank you.
Outsourcing and offshoring is the direction at the moment - other companies learned 10 years ago it is not a good idea.
Management changes every 1.5 - 2 years and the strategy changes with them hence it is very hard to accomplish anything. Lots of initiatives are being started, only to be cancelled and started from scratch under a different name by another department that managed to get the C-suite ears. No one talks to people from the previous project hence the same mistakes are being made.
Very poor communication between departments and this means in teams too.
Frustrating place to work as it's very hard to get good relationships with other teams.
Too much politics.

Cons

Too fast on change at change at times

Cons

Lots of organisational changes over a long period of time with lots of redundancies - HR did not deal well with people during the process

Cons

Not much domain knowledge built over the time

Cons

Poor communication
Friction between departments
Management kick downwards if there's a problem they have caused