AQA Reviews | Glassdoor.co.uk

AQA Reviews

Updated 25 October 2018
63 reviews

Filter

Filter


3.8
StarStarStarStarStar
Rating TrendsRating Trends
Recommend to a friend
Approve of CEO
(no image)
Andrew Hall
27 Ratings

Employee Reviews

Sort: PopularRatingDate

Pros
Cons
  • "to senior management when judging staff for lacking skills" (in 5 reviews)

  • "Due to a large temporary staff during summer, it can take some time for everyone to learn everything to do with their role" (in 5 reviews)

More Pros and Cons

  1. Helpful (1)

    "Breath of fresh air"

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Current Employee - Anonymous Employee
    Current Employee - Anonymous Employee
    Recommends
    Positive Outlook

    I have been working at AQA full-time

    Pros

    Great work-life balance
    Friendly and down to earth environment
    Sensible pay and benefits
    Flexible working

    Cons

    Can be reactive in approach

    Advice to Management

    Plan more


  2. Helpful (1)

    "Good"

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Current Employee - Marketing in Guildford, England
    Current Employee - Marketing in Guildford, England
    Recommends
    Neutral Outlook
    No opinion of CEO

    I have been working at AQA full-time (Less than a year)

    Pros

    Great community. Flexible working hours. Good work/life balance.

    Cons

    Expertise not appreciated. Feel like my job role is quite siloed.

  3. "Temporary Summer job"

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Current Employee - Anonymous Employee
    Current Employee - Anonymous Employee
    Recommends
    Neutral Outlook
    No opinion of CEO

    I have been working at AQA full-time

    Pros

    Good people to work with and good facilities.
    Good for students looking for a summer job.

    Cons

    Work is very repetitive.
    Hard to find parking


  4. Helpful (1)

    "Odd place for a change person"

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Former Employee - Anonymous Employee in Manchester, England
    Former Employee - Anonymous Employee in Manchester, England
    Doesn't Recommend
    Positive Outlook
    Disapproves of CEO

    I worked at AQA full-time (Less than a year)

    Pros

    Very intelligent people, great campus, good facilities and good fun. It's all good, unless you want to do something new

    Cons

    Lots of pretending to want change, but no desire to do what's necessary to get there. Ultimately, the noble purpose of doing good in education is stuck in the industrial revolution

    Advice to Management

    Don't pretend to be something you're not


  5. Helpful (1)

    "Administration at AQA"

    StarStarStarStarStar
    Former Employee - Administrative in Manchester, England
    Former Employee - Administrative in Manchester, England

    I worked at AQA full-time (Less than a year)

    Pros

    Different roles available amongst workforce of brilliant people.

    Cons

    Can be repetitive work, though this is alleviated by good working relationships.

    Advice to Management

    More changes of role would break up the work more.


  6. "Great Company"

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Former Employee - Anonymous Employee in Guildford, England
    Former Employee - Anonymous Employee in Guildford, England
    Recommends
    Positive Outlook
    Approves of CEO

    I worked at AQA full-time

    Pros

    - The people
    - Great work/life balance

    Cons

    Non that I can think of currently.


  7. "Good company with fantastic staff"

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Former Employee - Anonymous Employee
    Former Employee - Anonymous Employee
    Recommends
    Neutral Outlook
    Approves of CEO

    I worked at AQA full-time

    Pros

    The staff is very helpful and friendly. They want to provide the best service for the schools and strive for this. The training plan is really amazing, and you got a lot of opportunities to improve knowledge and expertise.

    Cons

    Senior management transparency is difficult, making difficult to understand their strategy. A lot of internal politics may sometimes delay progress and delivery. Too many managers with less and less doers.

    Advice to Management

    Listen more to your staff, communicate better to them. Continue offering more training to your staff which is really rewarding.

  8. Helpful (1)

    "Avoid working here - based on experience/observations - life threatening situations, disability hostile"

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Former Employee - Catering Assistant in Guildford, England
    Former Employee - Catering Assistant in Guildford, England
    Doesn't Recommend
    Negative Outlook
    Disapproves of CEO

    I worked at AQA full-time (More than 5 years)

    Pros

    Good holidays
    No others I can think of

    Cons

    Reviews
    1. Consultations on colleagues performance irregular - affecting conclusions. Positive service feedback unreported.
    2. Review process done wrong - wrong issues included, ie health, others not, long term goals. No mutually agreed reports
    3. Vague goals/ negative ‘constructive’ feedback– consistently insufficient detail on performance related to goals, affecting ability to improve. Management told, just said improve, little training. Comments - negatives written, positives turned negative/ ignored. Positive corrections (wrong actions, no positive feedback) considered good review approach.
    4. Actively used to replace existing staff, knowledge/abilities ignored.
    5. Review meetings irregular/rare – no time to correct behaviours. Management view final, implication read and sign forms, input unwanted, answering back. No real discussion.
    6. Management failure to resolve issues – unable to recognise, seek solutions for months, despite told. Stated unwillingness to train. Some issues resolved by others, others never.
    7. Email comments by staff – management happy to say situation different if gives their desired impression/ fail to act on them. No clarification sought.
    8. Judged negatively for failing to do jobs not done at all/ or hardly due to lack of opportunity.

    Training - Multiple requests for external training.
    1. Only in-house - If external desired, own time/self pay. Research from TV/ online.
    2. Automatic training requirements following reviews - fail to inform staff
    3. Staff training – not recorded or discussed after, any issues wrote refer to training.
    4. No one departmental approach to jobs – all doing differently, one way, one person fine, another wrong. Seen in multiple tasks.
    5. Admitted inability to teach essential skills – to senior management when judging staff for lacking skills. Some training only provided by colleagues.
    6. Training – hands on avoided, verbal short, then go, no written departmental targets.
    7. Reluctant to invest in training/MBTI/Learning style assessments – time away from work

    Unsupportive management
    1. Outgoing management kept quiet – officially following viewpoint required by those staying, quietly saying they were helping, they and others say staff doing well, substantially improving, rarely officially raised or recorded.
    2. Job description changes, staff unaware - Management unconcerned, despite having judged staff on unknown changes. No investigations/apologies.

    DISABILITY HOSTILE ENVIRONMENT/ MANAGEMENT
    Even supported management made little effort to communicate with staff different from them.
    1. Rigid Official Review performance targets - naturally biased against many disabilities, don’t recognise strengths due to communication styles.
    2. Disabilities - unable to understand effects of Autism/similar conditions. Judgement on ability to do work based on assumptions.

    Attitude changes - no safety issue, no preventative action
    1. Sharp, ANGRY management corrections – apology given, say will positively correct if see others doing same thing, in same way as just been corrected. Suddenly no issue.
    2. Correction for actions - displaying flexibility due to others action’s. Manager enters, no questions, one person blamed, another takes blame. Suddenly no issue, manager sharply says do properly, leaves.
    3. Wrong correction by official trainer – they apologised, issue not raised in recent training.

    Good relations management relations not encouraged – unapproachable, untrustworthy
    1. Negative service comments from customers – not acted on
    2. Negative comments when systems introduced – at times avoiding potentially life threatening/ unpleasant reactions, following training. Told to stop, time wasting.
    3. Angry/sharp/aggressive management style - if not get desired responses, or when help sought. Reasons not sought. Experienced by many.
    4. Consistency sought by Managers – managers routinely inconsistent - opposing approaches. Desired approach changes, staff not told in timely manner.
    5. Incorrect/negative information given by management - to staff concerning others, affecting departmental relations, corrected by team members. No comment on improvements.
    6. Unknown issues - Staff considered failing for not providing solutions, these not sought once told, negative written comments.

    Poor Management – Higher management aware of issues. No attempts to clarify.
    1. Unable to calculate increasing workload - reduced staff, at full stretch, told to cope.
    2. Output more important than health – health issues causing time off/affecting work considered valid negative review issues. Management concern - staff stressed, not reasons.
    3. In-house medicals, flu jabs etc – managers don’t tell you, attend in own time.
    4. Approved holidays not recorded - multiple overlaps, short staffing, stress. Consultation avoided further clashes. Staff falsely blamed for not following procedures.
    5. Rarely recorded contributions – not pass on changes in contribution requirements in timely manner, contributions not recognised.
    6. Communication poor/non-existent - targets, meetings, procedures etc. Negative feedback, different systems, inability to prepare for meetings, stakeholders not told of changes.
    7. Communication flexibility not required – If initial approach fails, other person blamed.
    8. ‘Discussions’/ Mentoring’ one way - from manager. Only very precise phrases acceptable.
    9. Poor Staffing/ work/ life balance – Staffing levels insufficient, temporary staff avoided. Stressed staff told to cope. Overtime essential (pressured to) in quiet times.
    10. Solutions – Only management ways wanted, others discouraged, including previous good systems. Ideas led to accusations of inability to cope, and blaming staff for failing.
    11. Management felt unable to listen by staff due to confidence loss – therefore did not raise issues/give explanations, denied it was their problem.

    New management lacking essential knowledge
    1. Failed to know staff - assumed abilities/learning styles - wasted time ‘teaching’ unnecessarily. Staff (perm & Temp) leaving, with useful information.
    1. Tried to hide mistakes - even when made aware. Resolved by speaking to higher management. Multiple mistakes.
    2. Management told something possibly not know – regular, sharp responses.
    3. Claimed issues not raised with them when they had – they had dismissed issue.
    4. Removed systems preventing issues - commented when re-occurred, solutions not sought.

    Favouritism
    1. Staff made official first aiders, receiving full external training before probationary interview.
    2. Some temporary staff retained once not needed, most go immediately.
    3. Some if they hate a task, removed from it. Others must do as allocated.
    4. 3 month probationary reviews – Most done after 4 months, favourites promptly, noted.
    5. Manager away, very new staff put in charge of team, despite lacking knowledge.
    6. Some staff offered chance to attend events, others not. Some on weekdays, some weekends. Others not even asked.

    Advice to Management

    1. Improve Communication – targets, desired behaviours, adapt to individuals
    2. Take responsibility for the results of your actions – and apologise- you will receive more respect, than by trying to be seen as perfect.
    3. Skills - Don’t correct staff for not having skills you admit you cannot teach.
    4. Manage staff - Take active role in dealing with misunderstanding between your staff in a timely manner. Recognise when staff have resolved issues themselves.
    5. Reveiw – look for positives as well as negatives. Learn how to do, to learn your staffs strengths
    6. Reconsider Staffing -Don’t assume overworked staff will continue to cope as work is added. Stress can be seen outside the department
    7. Coaching/monitoring - Learn the difference and what 2 way communication is. This improves information sharing.
    8. Listen to feedback from stakeholders - to improve it, ignoring it may result in loss of service/custom.
    9. People with disabilities – be willing to deal with them, some have great strengths if you look
    10. Tell staff of job role changes – when they happen, not months later. If told staff not told of changes they are later judged on, apologise. HR not always informed staff of changes.
    11. One approach for all staff – jobs approaches, correcting behaviours. Different approaches seen by staff. Avoid favouritism.


  9. "Absolutely loved working here - totally recommend!"

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Former Employee - Administrator in Manchester, England
    Former Employee - Administrator in Manchester, England
    Recommends
    Positive Outlook
    Approves of CEO

    I worked at AQA full-time (Less than a year)

    Pros

    - The people here are amazing
    - The pay is excellent, a real opportunity to build up some cash over summer
    - Management and team leaders constantly recognize your contribution and are very appreciative of your hard work
    - Challenging at times, but always fun
    - Best summer of my life. I've recommended it to close family and friends.

    Cons

    - There are none!

    Advice to Management

    Keep it up! You're doing terrific.


  10. "Great Place to work."

    StarStarStarStarStar
    • Work/Life Balance
    • Culture & Values
    • Career Opportunities
    • Comp & Benefits
    • Senior Management
    Current Employee - Customer Service Advisor in Manchester City Centre, England
    Current Employee - Customer Service Advisor in Manchester City Centre, England
    Recommends
    Positive Outlook
    Approves of CEO

    I have been working at AQA full-time (Less than a year)

    Pros

    Great summer job and seems permanent staff love it there to
    Usually have overtime hours available if you wish

    Cons

    There aren't really any cons