Bachem Reviews

3.0

32% would recommend to a friend

(151 total reviews)

Anne-Kathrin Stoller

Not enough data to show CEO approval

67% positive business outlook

Bachem has an employee rating of 3.0 out of 5 stars, based on 151 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Bachem employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

151 reviews
3.0
10 Jul 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I worked in a great team and the work was fast paced.

Cons

Not much room for progression, salary was very low for the work done

avatar
Bachem Response
6y
We appreciate you taking the time to give us your feedback. Our goal is to keep our employees happy and excited to come to work every day. It is also Bachem’s goal to ensure that employees are provided an opportunity for growth and development. Employees need to be interactive in this process and have an open dialogue with their supervisor regarding their development interests. The two parties can then work together toward those goals. On a regular basis, Bachem researches and evaluates our total compensation package compared to other companies in the area. Bachem is confident that our organization is very competitive. We continuously assess our attractiveness as an employer and look for opportunities to adjust our total compensation package to meet the needs of our employees. We appreciate the feedback you have provided and we value your opinion. Best wishes for continued success in your career.
2.0
12 Oct 2017

Safety is not in the top ten list of their priorities

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Excellent benefits for permanent employees -Good way to get GMP experience -Quickly growing company, so there are lot of opportunities to develop new hard and soft skills

Cons

There are many issues with Bachem, such as poor management, lack of planning, poor training, reliance on tribal knowledge, extremely poor understanding of work/life balance, extreme over-expectations of new trainees, and minimal cross-department support. Safety, however, has quickly risen to be a top issue. During a recent meeting, personnel complained to the Safety Department regarding noxious smells and adverse side effects two days after a spill had affected the majority of the facility. The Safety Department told the employees to read the SDS on the chemicals. Instead of asking for the details of the side effects, or the environment the employees were working in, or providing possible preventative measures the employees could take, the Safety Department said that they had an outside contractor test the facility and that the chemical limits were safe. Upon repeated questions and doubts from said personnel, the Safety Department referred the employees to their supervisors, and told the concerned employees that their supervisors would field questions from their staff. During the same meeting, the topic of fire drill training came up. A recent evacuation had left most employees confused and frustrated, as most people didn't know the details of evacuation procedure, and they were not properly informed that an evacuation was even occurring during a recent incident. The personnel requested for annual fire and evacuation drills. The Safety Department first responded by chastising the employees for not remembering the Emergency Evacuation SOPs that are digitally stored in the system. The Safety Department told the employees that safety is the employee's responsibility, so it is the responsibility of the employees to read and know the SOPs. The concerned personnel noted that they would *not* be reading a digital SOP during an emergency, so they would like annual training. The Safety Department responded by stating that they have wanted to do training, but the Fire Department had not been able to send someone out on a regular basis, but that they would try to schedule them in the future. These incidents, in my opinion, give a fair picture of the Safety Department's attitude towards their job and the employees. They seem to believe that they are not responsible for enforcing safety protocols, and are only responsible for developing a system. Adopting safety systems and training on those safety systems are either not their responsibility, or not a high priority.

avatar
Bachem Response
8y
The feedback regarding your perception of the health and safety department is appreciated. Bachem will strive to correct this in the future and assure that the message from management is unambiguous – safety is of the utmost importance to Bachem, and Bachem will not conduct its business at the expense of safety. Bachem expects commitment and hard work from its staff members to achieve common objectives, and in return Bachem is committed to providing a safe and healthy workplace. If you believe that your safety concerns are not being adequately addressed by either your direct supervisor or the health and safety department. I ask that you bring your concerns directly to me. I will assure that they are properly addressed.
Viewing 1 - 3 of 151 Reviews

Glassdoor has 208 Bachem reviews submitted anonymously by Bachem employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Bachem is right for you.