Coca-Cola Europacific Partners Employee Reviews about "hour"

Cons

Many hours in the day

Cons

The feeling of being unvalued and pretentious promotion system

Cons

Predefined schedule. No rewards. Given limits.

Cons

Leadership decision making No real drive for change and improvements Work related competencies trainings are missing. The focus is only on soft skills and I&D

Cons

Late hours but also works as a part time job

Cons

- sometimes decision making can be slower than what I would like - Integration to EU is largely going very well, there are a few teething issues that I'm sure we can work through - due to the passion that people show in the business this can translate into long hours every now and then.

Cons

You are always forced to work hard and long hours. Not recognized or appreciated for it.

Cons

No advancement opportunities and too many work hours without the pay to go along with the hours worked.

Cons

no work life balance long hours days

Cons

-I was recruited for this position although I saw the ad online 2 months earlier but I never applied. I know they had someone else working in the lab during that time, but when I asked what happened to them, seems they were gone and I was in. So you might be let go if someone more ideal comes along. -The interview took place in the lunchroom, while people were eating, walking past and stocking the fridge. Consequently, I didnt feel like I had an adequate chance to explain my qualifications and skills. The interview also felt rushed, and one of the interviewers seemed to be distracted by their phone. On completion of the interview I didn't feel as confident with this company, but didn't rule them out completely either. -On my first day I was left alone in the lab after an hour of training. I had never done these techniques before. -You work almost exclusively alone in the lab. -By the end of the first week, I had a lot of concerns regarding health and safety and quality assurance. Some things in the lab were not traditional compared to other ISO 17025 accredited labs that I've worked in. -I scheduled a meeting with my superiors to discuss my concerns and ideas for improvements, but I was terminated from my position soon after without any further communication from the company. - I did not receive any feedback or support from my employer upon my termination. -Much wasn't said in reposnse to my complaints, so didn't feel like I was being heard or it was up for discussion. -Additionally, I felt the company had inadequate health and safety induction, as there were many hazards I was unaware of and didn't know how to manage. -Inadequate access to resources (group chats, emails, paperwork) to perform role effectively. -Inadequate, incompetent training, no SOPs provided, trainer doing things differently than what they're supposed too, not telling me important info resulting in errors. -Rotating rosters, early starts, night shift. Can make it difficult to have routine and outside commitments. -Repetitive and simple tasks, autonomous role, leads to boredom. -The atmosphere was odd, as the company hired contractors despite being a large corporation. Didn't feel a part of the company but also expected to work there full time as a casual. -Apparently 10 New production team memebrs so some of the samples coming in weren't labelled or sampled correctly, makes my job harder. -They seem to like to keep the same people around and shift them around different roles. This can be problematic if the person isn't good at their job or doesn't offer new perspectives or solutions. You can miss out on new talent and fresh ideas. There are more cons in relation to the business but not relevant to this role. It will bug you if you have high standards for a workplace or quality assurance training. Overall, my experience was disappointing. I expected better, but now I know. Didn't expect to be terminated after voicing my concerns.