CyberArk Reviews

4.2

83% would recommend to a friend

(610 total reviews)
avatar

Matt Cohen | Udi Mokady

90% approve of CEO

79% positive business outlook

CyberArk has an employee rating of 4.2 out of 5 stars, based on 610 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The CyberArk employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

610 reviews
2.0
14 Feb 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great technology. Expanding business. Smart and talented co-workers. Company with great potential but it needs to address its internal problems if it wants to lead the way. In such a competitive context, a good product is not enough to remain at the top.

Cons

As others said, the atmosphere is negative which does not foster motivation. People constantly gossip about others. Suspicion is in the air. It's counter-productive. There is no transparency at the interview stage about what the job is really like which creates mistrust. The disappointment grows when one realises there is no proper induction training neither is there a training methodology in general. As someone said people go through the same mistakes as others, wasting everyone's time, only because the managers do not have a sharing knowledge/training methodology. Also, as someone mentioned, people put their personal interest above the company's.

2.0
10 Oct 2016

Only as a first job.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Overview: Having worked at multiple companies before joining CyberArk, I was expecting a well oiled machine that was the market leader in an innovative cyber security space. The solution that CyberArk is selling is a fantastic piece of software and deserves to retain its position in the market. Naturally being a market leader it effectively sells itself and in some regions even a cold call is warm. The majority of the senior leadership team are very humble and can be found sitting opposite junior members of the company at events and conferences.

Cons

Culture and career: CyberArk boasts about having a fantastic culture. It doesn’t. It’s a myth created by and bought into by management that the CyberArk culture is the best in the industry. The myth is used as a bargaining chip to pay lower wages, low commission and to convince people that they are lucky to be in the company. The company forbids its employees to discuss their wage, not uncommon but in today’s day-and-age such practices create an air of suspicion. It is apparent that pay rises are given out based on favouritism rather than merit; some of the longer serving members of the team have not seen a pay rise in nearly two years despite overachieving on all their targets. This leads me onto the lack of control some managers have over their staff. By not paying attention to employees, people exploit other people’s work and claim it as their own allowing them to hit their targets, get paid increased commission and skew their numbers by nearly 80-100%. This practice leads to the wrong people getting promoted and the company suffering in the long run. This is also one of the practices that leads to high turnover in some of the teams. In other words, you will have a miserable time at CyberArk unless you cheat and steal. This is not a company for someone who has any integrity. Structure: The teams are too big which leads to silos forming and subgroups growing within them. There is no cross-department interaction which leads to each silo looking after themselves and inhibiting any form of knowledge sharing from taking place. This leads to a lot of duplication of effort and bad coordination between teams and hinders anyone from being able to move into new departments. Management and leadership: There are a number of competent and incompetent managers in most companies. CyberArk has its fair share. Spanning across multiple departments there are managers who seem incapable of performing their roles. From HR’s inability to see arising problems in labour turnover, absenteeism and general disgruntlement to Heads of Department who try to undermine peoples’ trust in each other in an attempt to impose some form of arbitrary control over individuals. There is no visibility of what management are actually doing even when they are paid in excess of £100,000, instead employees are treated like drones, judged on their ability to perform in the role they are in and casually undermined and rudely belittled if they offer any challenge to their managers or seniors. Overall As a first job to make some money if you're still living with your parents, maybe, but definitely not more than that.

2.0
19 Dec 2015

Mixed experience

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some really interesting technology and acquisitions. Opportunities for travel. Really great coworkers (at least in my immediate team). One of the best bosses I have ever worked for, seriously. Remuneration was overall pretty good, there's better out there in the industry though.

Cons

Them and us atmosphere between long termers / pre-IPO guys and newer recruits, cliquey as others have said. Knowledge sharing is horrible/non-existent which without a doubt costs hundreds or thousands of hours of wasted time as everybody has to burn through the exact same processes/failures as colleagues already did because there's no way to share what you know beyond your immediate colleagues. Insane levels of secrecy/paranoia/outright hostility between colleagues in different departments / countries leads to extreme bunker mentality, this is poisoning the atmosphere and costing time and money. Next to no forward communication from upper/senior management about direction, troops on the ground find out about things at best around the same time that the customers do, not cool if you are sat with that customer at the time. Company is rich and profitable but can be painfully cheap - enforced room sharing as standard with colleagues you barely know on international trips (ugh) and quibbling over the tiniest expenses. Bonus structure is complex and not worth writing home about in reality. Promises get made at interview that are forgotten once you're in the door because low headcount is a constant pressure (turnover). Releases are increasingly shipping that have pretty fundamental bugs in. Huge pressure from the commercial guys to do whatever will help them to get their next bonus check, not what is best for the customer or the company longer term. This is a lawsuit waiting to happen.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 610 Reviews

Glassdoor has 678 CyberArk reviews submitted anonymously by CyberArk employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if CyberArk is right for you.