employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Focus Partners Wealth

Is this your company?

Not Recommended - Associate Wealth Advisor Focus Partners Wealth Employee Review

1.0
6 Dec 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The pros of working at Buckingham include: - They pay well and have good benefits - There are many people across the company to help you with questions. - The investment philosophy makes sense. However, they are beginning to introduce new "alternatives" that are expensive and have a high turnover. These investment options go against the low-cost, nearly passive approach that they've preached for years, which is a worrying sign.

Cons

Cons of Buckingham include: - Antiquated Technology. For example, everyone has a desktop computer. Their CRM is an extremely old Microsoft system. In addition, their internal systems are slow, clunky, and outdated. Their financial planning software is a cheap, off-the-shelf option that is very limited in what it can do. - As an Associate Wealth Advisor, you're forced to spend your time on what many would call "operations" jobs. These can be a huge time suck (e.g., sending reports and bills to clients), and it doesn't make sense for an AWA to do them. Much of that type of work should by done by admins. - The company has no interest in hearing constructive criticism. They think they're doing everything well already.

Explore other reviews about Focus Partners Wealth

5.0
21 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

A great place to earn your CFP and continue to learn a lot of the technical sides of the industry as an associate. Lots of support to learn the ropes and become a competent advisor.

Cons

It doesn't do as good of a job at teaching you the business development side of the business as much as all the other technical skills at least in your early years. That focus is reserved for once you reach past the associate level. If you want to be somewhere where you can really invest a lot of time into a personal client base in the early years of your career then here may not be a good fit.

3.0
12 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Exposure to the financial advisory business and client service environment - Opportunity to work closely with advisors and observe financial planning in practice - Team culture can be positive depending on where you land

Cons

The role is heavily administrative, much more than what may be communicated during the hiring process. Financial planning tends to take a back seat to operational and support tasks, especially in the early years. From what I observed, it can take anywhere from 3 to 7 years before planning becomes a meaningful part of the role, depending on experience and team structure. Growth is possible, but slow. Advancing from AWA 1 to AWA 2 typically takes around two years +, and even with promotion, compensation remains relatively low compared to expectations and workload. Compensation overall is a concern. Annual bonuses were underwhelming, especially given the long wait to receive them. This can be discouraging for employees who are expecting performance-based rewards in a more timely and competitive manner. The reporting structure can also create challenges. In addition to a direct manager, associates may report to multiple advisors depending on workload. This can lead to competing priorities and, at times, unnecessary psychological stress. While I didn’t spend enough time to fully evaluate company-wide culture, it’s clear that team-level dynamics play a significant role. The right team can enhance the experience, while the wrong fit can make it much more difficult. Advice to Candidates: If compensation, strong team dynamics, and psychological safety are important to you, evaluate this role carefully. Ask specific questions during the interview process about daily responsibilities, advisor expectations, compensation, and growth opportunities to ensure the role aligns with your career goals.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All