Toxic environment with serious leadership and financial issues - Anonymous employee TAPS Employee Review

1.0
13 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The clients. The mission. The volunteers.

Cons

No opportunity for professional growth. Misspending grant and donor funds, failure to adhere to grantor requirements. Inaccurate reporting to grantors. Inability to cover payroll through legitimate financial means. Failure to include department heads and program managers in ensuring grant dollars are spent on their programs in accordance with grant requirements. Salary is sub par, if you want a livable wage don’t work at TAPS. Employee roles are deemed to be no longer needed for critical positions when they speak truth to leadership and they are pushed out of the organization. Persintant and pervasive hostile work environment. Disability descrimination. Mission creep away from seminar and support services for clients. Lack of empowerment and trust by President and founder. Consistent back stabbing by senior leadership. Retirement plan is sub par. Toxicity is boiling over. Leadership makes changes to progamming without due consideration of best practices and employees who run the programming. President and founder lies about conversations. Age discrimination is prevalent. Gender discrimination against males is prevalent. Failure to take advice of employees who are the bots on the ground. Failure of directors to advocate for their teams. Failure to adhere to best practices. One bad month away from financial catastrophe.

Explore other reviews about TAPS

5.0
9 Oct 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The HR person is the most competent, smart human I have ever encountered. Her advice in my career has been invaluable. The head of the company needs to pay her more to keep her on! I love my job and she has been instrumental in it

Cons

Need higher pay for employees

2.0
31 Aug 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great mission and some great subject matter experts

Cons

Micromanagement, gossip, passive aggressive leadership (veiled criticism, outright abusive criticism in front of colleagues, isolation, constant change in direction, mismanagement of funds, and more. Siloed teams. Hoarding of information.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All