employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Georgia Tech Research Institute

Is this your company?

Georgia Tech Research Institute Reviews

3.9

59% would recommend to a friend

(564 total reviews)

Mike Gazarik

53% approve of CEO

43% positive business outlook

Georgia Tech Research Institute has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 564 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Georgia Tech Research Institute employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management and consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

564 reviews
1.0
11 Apr 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Paid time off and sick day are great. Both can be rolled over, but since the company offers NO paid maternity leave I exhausted both to pay for days off with my new born child.

Cons

Very toxic work place. Complete discriminatory against female engineers. If i can rate it any lower than 1 star I would.

2.0
28 Sept 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Interesting work (sometimes) Work can shift between tedious but necessary to fun/exciting. -Some committed, hardworking people scattered throughout the organization. There are some amazing people at GTRI that are recognized as the world experts in their fields of study. Being able to talk with and learn from them is a great opportunity. -Good benefits (if you have time to use them) that management tries to sell as offsetting lower wages. The benefits are good. You receive 14 hours/month of vacation and 8 hours/month of sick leave. Vacation accrues to 45 days and then becomes "use it or lose it" within the calendar year. Sick leave accrues forever. -The job security is good as long as work is coming in. Most of the work is military/DoD based that requires US citizenship (and usually a clearance) so there's no chance of it being sent to India or China. -Prestige of working for Georgia Tech. (If GT could cut it out with the scandals, that would be great.)

Cons

-Stagnant salaries w/ minimal raises and shrinking benefits GTRI faculty are lumped into the state budget as teachers and it feels like we are treated as the lowest form of life imaginable when raises are discussed. The raises are ~1-3% and it can be two years or more between them. Combine this with inflation and the growing job market in Atlanta and you have situations where people are being hired in at higher rates than the people that have been here for several years. The largest raise you will likely ever see is a 6% promotion raise. (Which happens at most 2-3 times over an entire career.) If you happen to get a promotion the same year as merit raises occur, expect to receive a 0-1% merit raise since you're getting a 6% promotion raise. The benefits offsetting a lower wage is somewhat valid at hiring, but the benefits are typically stagnant or increase price every year while raises are minimal. This typically results in a year to year reduction in your overall salary. A perfect example of this: The Board of Regents has added a $100/month fee for anyone that has their spouse on GT insurance. (If the spouse has the option of insurance at their own job.) This and the standard benefit price increase will negate any raise I saw this year. -Easy to become over committed to multiple programs If you establish yourself as being competent, be prepared to have everyone wanting you to work for them. It's good to have choices of what to work on, but be careful not to say yes to everything and end up having to work for free (no such thing as overtime for a GTRI engineer) to meet deadlines. -Retention problems We're losing RE2/SRE level engineers at an alarming rate. It has become a consistent phenomenon that we take in a new college grad, get them a security clearance, forge them into a decent engineer, and they jump ship to a better opportunity within a year or two of completing a Master’s Degree. (That's a fair strategy for career advancement and I wish them well.) But, GTRI is unable to replace them with engineers at the same level and experience. This results in pressure on the remaining experienced engineers to take on additional responsibilities leading to more engineers leaving. I’m very concerned that we’re going to reach a point where we’re unable to perform on key large programs leading to loss of customer faith and repeat business.

2.0
29 Jun 2018

Oligarchy

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

21 vacation days, plus 12 holidays per year for everyone. Excellent retirement benefits; while some employers match sum fraction of employee contributions, GTRI contributes $1.5 for every $1 saved by the employee. Flexible working hours. Potentially interesting work in autonomous environment, but that is highly dependent on your Lab Director.

Cons

Lab Directors are essentially absolute dictators. They can take projects away from researchers (Principal Investigators), poach key personnel from your project or force personnel onto your project, all without any accountability. Legally, the Principal Investigator (PI) for a project is responsible for ensuring the legitimacy of all charges to their (typically government) sponsored research project; however, the organization supports a Lab Director’s (and his proxies) ability to override a PI’s management decisions. Thus as PI you are legally accountable for decisions you do not have the power to make.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 564 Reviews

Glassdoor has 829 Georgia Tech Research Institute reviews submitted anonymously by Georgia Tech Research Institute employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Georgia Tech Research Institute is right for you.