Ranker Reviews

3.8

66% would recommend to a friend

(71 total reviews)

Clark Benson

52% approve of CEO

48% positive business outlook

Ranker has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 71 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Ranker employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Media and communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

71 reviews
2.0
24 Oct 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-A lot of intelligent, well-educated employees from a wide range of disciplines and backgrounds. You actually learn things working for the site. -There is room for creativity and, even at the junior level, you get a say in the direction you want to take your work and the direction of the site overall. -The CEO is an incredibly nice person who is genuinely excited about the company and encouraging towards his employees. While he's fairly disorganized and places his trust in the wrong people, he is inspiring and supportive. -Free lunches on Tuesdays and kitchen stocked with lots of snacks.

Cons

-Extremely ableist language used throughout the site. Jokes about mental health issues and disabilities are routinely made via Slack by senior management. Lower level employees who say anything are often treated caustically for speaking out and concerns are largely ignored by HR. It gives the site a terrible reputation overall, despite the fact there's great content on certain channels. Not to mention, employees with disabilities are shamed into not asking for the accommodations they're entitled to by law because senior management sees this as a liberal snowflake mentality. -No training, unclear expectations, and lots of mixed messages from higher ups. It gets to the point employees who have been there for years have no idea if they're doing a good job. There is a revolving door of employees and an extremely high percentage of employees are fired in less than a year without a lot of clear communication beforehand. This leads to extremely low office morale and a general sense of paranoia. Everyone there is pretty miserable after awhile. -Many senior employees have never worked in another digital media company and only know Ranker's original style and tone, which was pretty clickbaity and often published articles that are downright offensive by modern standards. Many senior editors and managers are stuck in their ways as they've never really opened their eyes to modern politics or culture. The site is stuck in a state of arrested development as a result. Although some editors are making a big push to change this, their efforts are constantly undermined. -Editors are extremely caustic to freelance writers, who are grossly underpaid by market standards. There is an entire Slack channel dedicated to mocking freelancers and the negativity comes through in communication between editors and writers. As a result, many freelancers simply drop out of contact or quit. -The company is extremely disorganized and hierarchy is unclear. As a result, projects often fall to the wayside and many editors have no idea what they're supposed to be doing in a given day or how they're supposed to prioritize their work. As stated, the CEO is well meaning and has good vision, but he seems to have placed his trust in the wrong people, unfortunately. -While the healthcare is excellent, the pay is extremely low by market standards even at the senior/associate level and employees only get five days vacation.

2.0
22 Oct 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

*Some* of the people at this company are absolutely brilliant and genuinely terrific individuals. The stocked kitchen and massages are a nice bonus and definitely make up for the worse aspects of the company.

Cons

Ranker.com is as ugly as the south-bound end of a Holstein heifer, and the day to day office operations mirror that perfectly. The amount of backbiting, undermining, and emotional abuse perpetrated by management is downright shocking, and the number of people who have left this company because they can't handle the inhumanity of it is higher than anyone would like to admit. This is a company where the higher ups wear horse blinders and make little effort to improve company moral, instead using people until they can't take it anymore and then happily disposing of them. What managements tells you to your face is rarely the truth, and management is only too happy to keep the confusion swirling by wasting time with distracting and frankly idiotic attempts at fixing problems which ought to be at the end of their priorities. The people in power are spineless and spiteful, and always take the easiest route, even if it means allowing a sexual harasser to remain employed by the company while those who brought claims to light are punished. If you want to be subjected to the rantings of the Napoleon complex embodied, then by all means go work at Ranker.

1.0
4 Feb 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- There are some genuinely intelligent, passionate, hardworking people at Ranker who do their best to create good content. - If you're looking for an entry level position in editing or social media, they'll hire you if you're smart and you can get some experience - There's a decent snack selection in the kitchen

Cons

Ranker pays well below market rate for writers and editors. Once, a manager described associate editors in a meeting as "just bodies in chairs." That should give you an idea of the ingrained toxicity in the company. Ranker expects editors to work long hours (usually 9-6 if you eat lunch at your desk) and adhere to Byzantine management structure and guidelines. This is while being paid literally minimum wage in some cases. If you raise a complaint, the most common response is "this is just how things work at a start up." The thing is, the company has been around for 10 years and has around 100 employees. Editors are treated like second-class citizens. People in other departments look down on editorial, and employees are referred to as "the kids" in upper management meetings. To be clear, 28-year-old professional editors are called children by their employers. It's a running joke that members of the product and dev teams can basically get away with whatever they want. They once got a pizza party because the team members showed up to the office before 10:30 AM. Seriously. There's a gross imbalance in the way certain members of the company are treated. That's not a millennial snowflake perspective. No one's expecting day care. They're just expecting to be fairly compensated for hard work. That's to say nothing of the casual sexism and racism. It's very much a boys' club, with all that entails. Once during a meeting the CEO stopped to ask every woman in the room what they thought of doing a makeup vertical. Because girl stuff. Another time while introducing a new employee to the company (she was of Korean heritage), he suggested that she start a K-Pop group with the office manager (who also happened to be Korean). Women are consistently described as either "emotional" or "too quiet" in performance reviews, and God forbid you try to speak up during a meeting while white men are talking. A real fun time. Also, the content itself is soul-sucking. Management won't pay decent rates for writers, so editors are sometimes forced to re-write entire pieces. The whole operation is myopically focused on Facebook traffic, which explains why they grew too quickly too fast and have since had to lay off employees. TL;DR - Avoid Ranker at all costs. It's a sinking ship and the ride down will be awful.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 71 Reviews

Glassdoor has 92 Ranker reviews submitted anonymously by Ranker employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Ranker is right for you.