Glassdoor users rated their interview experience at Barnard College as 100% positive with a difficulty rating score of 4 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty). Candidates interviewing for Resident Assistant and rated their interviews as the hardest, whereas interviews for Resident Assistant and roles were rated as the easiest.
The hiring process at Barnard College takes an average of 60 days when considering 1 user submitted interviews across all job titles. Candidates applying for Resident Assistant had the quickest hiring process (on average 60 days), whereas Resident Assistant roles had the slowest hiring process (on average 60 days).
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
I applied online. I interviewed at Barnard College (New York, NY) in Feb 2026
Interview
The interview process took roughly 4 and a half months with multiple meetings and very little regards for the candidate's time. The supervisor for the position seemed unsure of what she really wanted for the position. She also seem to be a bit naive about the amount of work that would be required. This helped to explain the low salary being offered. It was evident given her first round of questions that she did not take the time to really review my resume. The staff members seemed annoyed during the interview process as though they had been forced to participate and therefore seem wagered to finish it. At the end, I had to reach out for an update when they stopped responding. Seemed pretty unprofessional given the level of the position and the time invested. According to other colleagues, Barnard has a reputation for being exceedingly slow with hiring and with many administrative processes.
I applied online. I interviewed at Barnard College (New York, NY) in Mar 2026
Interview
Interviewed for a Senior Accountant position and unfortunately found the interview process to be very impersonal and disengaging. The initial interview was conducted entirely through the Spark video platform, where questions appeared on the screen and candidates were required to record responses without interacting with an actual person.
While I understand companies are increasingly using technology in recruiting, the process felt overly automated and lacked the human interaction that is important in evaluating both candidate fit and company culture. It was difficult to get a sense of the team, leadership style, or overall work environment through a one-sided recorded interview format.
The experience left me with a somewhat negative impression of the hiring process because it felt more focused on filtering candidates through automation rather than creating a meaningful and professional conversation. For a position that requires collaboration and communication, I expected a more personal approach to the interview process.
Overall, the role itself seemed interesting, but the recruiting experience felt detached and not particularly candidate-friendly.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Walk me through your experience with a Cash Flows statement.
I applied online. I interviewed at Barnard College (New York, NY)
Interview
Smooth and expected; shorter phone interview followed by in person interview with larger team. Everyone I spoke to was really kind, supportive, and curious about finding the right person for the role. The 2nd interview was a mix of challenging, logistical, and experience questions that felt manageable while keeping me engaged.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Tell us about a time when you had to deliver "bad" or challenging news to someone, and how did it go?