The interview process started straightforwardly, with standard questions and a request for feedback on a blog post. I appreciated this emphasis on practical skills. I experienced a significant delay (the company was 45 minutes late) during my second, in-person interview, which I requested to be rescheduled. The rescheduled interview seemed productive; we discussed my feedback and the potential tasks I’d handle. I was offered the position later that day. When I asked about the potential for a hybrid work schedule after the probationary period, I received a surprising response. Although I understood the role was primarily in-person and was ready to commit to this, my question was interpreted as a misalignment of expectations and the offer was rescinded. In the ensuing correspondence, there were gross inconsistencies in the reasons provided for the withdrawal of the offer. The insinuation that I was attempting to take advantage of company generosity was both unfounded and disappointing. While I respect every organization’s right to make decisions in their interest, it’s essential that such decisions are based on accurate information and transparent communication. The feedback I experienced during this process were disheartening and reflected negatively on my perception of the company culture.