Overview: Participated in the Site Office Manager recruitment process from March to October 2025 in Thessaloniki, including several interview rounds and follow‑up conversations. What happened: • I was repeatedly told I was the main candidate and given timelines for feedback. • Promised feedback deadlines were missed on multiple occasions. • At one point the role was described as “on hold,” yet an automated message later indicated the position had been filled. • Final outcome: the position was reopened and filled without clear, consistent communication to candidates who had invested significant time. Impact: The process required a substantial time commitment and created avoidable uncertainty. For a company that emphasizes professionalism, the recruitment execution felt misaligned with that message. Bottom line: If you value transparent timelines and consistent communication, this hiring process falls short.