Recruiter didn't show up after scheduling time twice. Once interview was scheduled first call with hiring manager, second round of take home test which takes around 5 to 8 hours. Third round for presentation + demo. After that team ghosted me. Recruiter, recruiter coordinator, hiring manager none of them gave me feedback or responded to any email. After investing 20 hours in interviewing, giving feedback is least they can do.

The initial conversations were positive, and I spoke with some genuinely great people early in the process. However, things quickly became less encouraging as the interview progressed. The take home exercise was disproportionately large in scope for what was expected to be a 30–40 minute presentation. While the company states that deep expertise in Snowflake isn't a requirement, it's hard to see how a candidate without substantial experience could realistically meet the expectations. Recruiter communication left a lot to be desired. They missed responses I'd already sent and followed up days later asking for information I had already provided. This lack of attention to detail was frustrating and unprofessional. Operationally, I was surprised at the challenges involved in simply extending a trial environment for testing and learning. No one seemed to know how to get it done, which seemed like a basic ask in a tech-forward company. The in person interview ran over by 40 minutes, which I found disrespectful given the amount of time and effort I had already committed. I was only able to present a fraction of the work I had prepared because one of the AEs took control of the session, sidelining the hiring manager and steering the conversation in a completely different direction. It became clear that they were looking for a unique hybrid of Consultant, Data Engineer, Insurance Subject Matter Expert, and Solutions Engineer... essentially, a unicorn. While the compensation for the role is attractive (it appears to be the only SE position currently open in Ireland), the expectations suggest a high likelihood of being overworked, likely on-site with clients, wearing a suit, and primarily acting as a go-between. One of the panelists remarked that the job was like "doing two jobs at once while also completing a PhD." I knew this person previously and was shocked by the comment. Whether it was intended as a test or an attempt to set expectations, it came off as tone-deaf and demoralising. The moment I walked out of the interview, I knew this wasn't the right fit. No level of compensation is worth being ground down for a role that lacks realistic expectations or respect for your time.