employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

American Friends Service Committee

Is this your company?

American Friends Service Committee Reviews

4.4

87% would recommend to a friend

(37 total reviews)

Shan Cretin

83% approve of CEO

61% positive business outlook

American Friends Service Committee has an employee rating of 4.4 out of 5 stars, based on 37 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The American Friends Service Committee employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Non-profit and NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

37 reviews
1.0
17 Jan 2019

Soft racism

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good benefits and great values on paper

Cons

Unfortunately their values are not always put into practice. Most supervisors tend to be older white folks holding on to their positions tightly, while most junior staff are people of color who are being exploited for their skills, but not trusted to take on leadership or in achieving advancement in the organization. Many people of color end up leaving because of this, or stay because they need the benefits or pay or other perks. But there is a lack of respect for young people of color unfortunately.

2.0
5 Oct 2012

Not what it seems

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great Benefits, great location, long term history of peace and justice work, great reputation of work inthe 1950's and 60's.

Cons

Dysfuntional work environment, identiity crisis for the past 15 years.

4.0
2 Apr 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The only organization in the country paying organizers to run crucial peace and human rights programs on the ground in communities across the nation. The program staff were given lots of resources to do our work and lots of trust from management, and the people in the communities we got to work with were amazing. I learned a lot about being an organizer, with support and encouragement from direct management, as well as learning from other coworkers that have been doing the work even longer. Lots of opportunities for collaboration across issue, i.e. Anti-war and immigrants rights, because of working in the same space. The pay and benefits were very competitive among similar nonprofits.

Cons

The financial cuts and layoffs in 2009 were devastating. Many regions have still not recovered the number of programs and staff that were in place before then. Top management also did not handle the layoffs well, keeping a larger proportion of highly-paid management and admin staff, and therefore having to layoff a larger proportion of direct program staff at the lowest salary levels. Also, after the layoffs, compensation and benefits became much less competitive, forcing even more good organizers with decades of experience to leave. The regional management was wonderful in my experience, the difficulties were how much was required to go through the central bureaucracy in Philadelphia. The Quaker tradition is to deliberate on decisions and make democratic decisions, but there was not enough infrastructure in place (or possibly intention) to communicate in a reasonable timeline with staff on the ground about what was happening in the process of decision making. They wanted to centralize media work at one point, but then we could never get the time and attention of the central media staff to do the media for our location.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 37 Reviews

Glassdoor has 65 American Friends Service Committee reviews submitted anonymously by American Friends Service Committee employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if American Friends Service Committee is right for you.