Pros
The only silver lining of this place is one the students are absent so you get to rest a little.
Cons
One of the most common concerns among employees is the low salary. The company keeps responding that it's "within industry standards" and "agreed upon," but what they don’t mention is that when you start, they only highlight their cheaper subscription plans. In reality, more than half of the clients pay for premium plans, yet this is never reflected in teacher salaries. Additionally, despite a contractual promise of a yearly salary review, this does not happen.
Beyond pay, the structure for student progress is nonexistent, leaving teachers to manage everything on their own. This makes the job far more demanding than it should be, especially considering how little students pay relative to their high expectations and treatment of teachers. The platform asks teachers to treat students with exceptional care, but when students are rude, provocative, or downright disrespectful, there is little to no support. The salary is simply too low for teachers to tolerate such behavior in silence. It’s disappointing that some accept these conditions.
The lesson materials are another major issue. They are created by individuals with no teaching qualifications—many come from finance or media backgrounds with no knowledge of pedagogy. As a result, the lessons are poorly structured, ineffective, and make teaching much harder than it should be.
Lastly, there is a shocking pay disparity among teachers based on nationality. Some nationalities receive fewer lessons but are paid more, even when others (who are paid less) have clearer accents and are preferred by students. This unfairness is frustrating and discouraging for those who put in the effort and deliver quality lessons. Oh and one last thing! The low salary is always late because the company's financial transactions are shady .
