employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Alliance for Workforce Development

Is this your company?

Passionate work with decreasing leadership quality - Career Center Advisor Alliance for Workforce Development Employee Review

2.0
26 Jul 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The work you do is something to be proud of. You are actually changing someone's life and improving your community. My co-workers are good people that you want to become friends with. Pay is good and they were allowing a lot of flexibility.

Cons

The company has had more turnover than you can imagine, especially in leadership causing increased workloads and chaos. This wasn't a good thing. When over half the company is "new", that should tell you who the common denominator is responsible for causing good employees to run at the first chance. Ironically just about the entire leadership team work "remote" and are never in offices to provide meaningful relationships and support.

Explore other reviews about Alliance for Workforce Development

5.0
3 Dec 2021
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Working with others to assist in making a career plan.

Cons

Not being able to currently meet with people face-to-face.

1.0
3 Jul 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Lots of paid holiday time off. There is opportunity to help people who are in need of work and change lives.

Cons

Poorly equipped management and directors with no experience in leadership. Favoritism and longevity are the only way to promote. Qualification’s were often overlooked to make sure the work bestie got the promotion. I watched productive quality employees who were disliked by their supervisor get very different treatment than those who kissed up yet were ineffective in their position and made consistent mistakes. The vibe is very similar to mean girls in high school. Rules for thee but not for me. The focus was often on spending grant money regardless of how it helped clients. There was a good amount of waste when funding had not been distributed in a timely manner just so that it wouldn’t have to be returned.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All