My best employment experience as a nurse - Registered Nurse Atrium Health Employee Review

4.0
29 Sept 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Generous PTO, competitive compensation, relatively easy transfers into other departments and positions, and rewards for loyalty. One of the two great hospital systems in the area. I am fortunate enough to have an amazing direct supervisor, and this is a large part of my satisfaction with my employment here. I started as a part-time/PRN employee, and eventually accepted a full time position. I believe they reward hard work, and value good ideas. My compensation has gone up every year through merit-based raises, and market adjustments. I believe they truly want their teammates to achieve a healthy work/life balance. Full-time teammates are able to earn $750 per year in their HSA just for jumping through a few hoops and taking a survey or two. This helps to offset the high deductible of the one health insurance plan that everyone is frustrated with.

Cons

Management can be reactionary, seem detached, and sometimes can't predict unintended consequences of their actions, like schedule redesigns that result in layoffs, eventually leading to staffing shortages. Also, the branding and advertising has gotten a little weird. #thecareyoudemand being a good example of a meaningless attention-grabbing slogan that nobody really understands. Insurance plan is substandard, and coverage options are limited. There is no reason that a company like CHS shouldn't be able to offer better healthcare plans.

Explore other reviews about Atrium Health

5.0
13 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great training and culture. There is continuing education throughout the year.

Cons

I had no cons for this job. I loved working here.

2.0
21 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I spent many years in outpatient rehabilitation and saw firsthand how much meaningful patient care can happen when clinicians are empowered. Earlier in my tenure, there were real opportunities for growth, mentorship and professional development. The team was collaborative and deeply committed to patients, and support staff worked hard under challenging circumstances. Those are strengths worth acknowledging.

Cons

As leadership changed, the culture around performance and advancement shifted. Over time I felt that institutional memory, specialty expertise and long‑term contributions were not valued consistently. Promotion practices seemed opaque, and I saw clinicians with substantially less experience and questionable communication acumen move into roles without clear explanations. Most importantly, I experienced increasing friction between high performers and leaders whose roles felt more performative than grounded in clinical or operational expertise. That tension appeared to be tolerated by the institution. Questions about decisions were discouraged, and requests for discussion went unanswered—even when they came from people with decades of service and a record of strong outcomes. After years of above‑average performance reviews, the feedback I received near the end of my tenure seemed inconsistent with my record and, in my view, hypocritical. This sudden shift in narrative felt like a mechanism to justify decisions already made rather than an honest assessment. For clinicians who invest deeply in their programs and relationships, contradictory or last‑minute feedback is demoralizing and undermines trust in the review process. Although department leaders appear to view themselves as emotionally intelligent, my experience was quite different: they delivered polished, stoic performances but did not exhibit the empathy, listening, or unbiased 360 assessment skills that clinicians need from leadership. That disconnect was another source of friction between high performers and management.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All