Sh!t Show - Travel Nurse Atrium Health Employee Review

1.0
4 Jan 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Management did actually seem nice

Cons

The overflow/covid units are staffed ONLY by travelers, so no core staff are working on the unit. The units are capped at 10-12 beds and are staffed by 2 nurses per shift (both travelers) along with one CNA. There are no unit coordinators or lab team, so the nurses are doing everything- all the paperwork, answering call lights and phones, drawing and sending their own labs, etc. Because everyone is a traveler, no one on the floor is familiar with policies or protocols, doctors and their preferences, etc. which creates chaos and major patient safety issues. The units are a huge mess, with bins of random stuff lying all over the place which makes it hectic and dangerous in emergency situations. The clean supply room is greatly lacking and understocked. The patients are high acuity and frequently 1-2 assist, incontinent, etc.

Explore other reviews about Atrium Health

5.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good benefits, work life balance

Cons

have to use PTO for holidays

1
2.0
21 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I spent many years in outpatient rehabilitation and saw firsthand how much meaningful patient care can happen when clinicians are empowered. Earlier in my tenure, there were real opportunities for growth, mentorship and professional development. The team was collaborative and deeply committed to patients, and support staff worked hard under challenging circumstances. Those are strengths worth acknowledging.

Cons

As leadership changed, the culture around performance and advancement shifted. Over time I felt that institutional memory, specialty expertise and long‑term contributions were not valued consistently. Promotion practices seemed opaque, and I saw clinicians with substantially less experience and questionable communication acumen move into roles without clear explanations. Most importantly, I experienced increasing friction between high performers and leaders whose roles felt more performative than grounded in clinical or operational expertise. That tension appeared to be tolerated by the institution. Questions about decisions were discouraged, and requests for discussion went unanswered—even when they came from people with decades of service and a record of strong outcomes. After years of above‑average performance reviews, the feedback I received near the end of my tenure seemed inconsistent with my record and, in my view, hypocritical. This sudden shift in narrative felt like a mechanism to justify decisions already made rather than an honest assessment. For clinicians who invest deeply in their programs and relationships, contradictory or last‑minute feedback is demoralizing and undermines trust in the review process. Although department leaders appear to view themselves as emotionally intelligent, my experience was quite different: they delivered polished, stoic performances but did not exhibit the empathy, listening, or unbiased 360 assessment skills that clinicians need from leadership. That disconnect was another source of friction between high performers and management.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All