employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

B&H Photo Video

Is this your company?

Great mix of co-workers. Like a family. Conservative primarily Hassidic community work there. - Sales Person B&H Photo Video Employee Review

3.0
16 Jun 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

People. A good mix of expertise in their respective fields. Salespeople. Expertise is unmatched. They meet well over 100+ people per day, who are also often experts. This exchange is usually honest. I have not, for example, ever had a salesman, sell me something that I did not need beyond my Continuing Education - Product representatives visit often, and give first-views of new products. Event Space wonderful resource for learning new technologies and how customers use the products. Vacation time. Two long Jewish holidays per year. Get out early for Friday Shabbat. 2 p.m. Good work/life balance.

Cons

Conservative management makes it difficult to push ideas through. Not necessarily a con, but be aware that you must also be mindful of the predominantly Hassidic culture. Some floors are separated male/female. Feels too big sometimes. Get lost in the mix.

Explore other reviews about B&H Photo Video

5.0
16 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

the company benefits are good

Cons

long hours and some clients can be demanding

2.0
11 Dec 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

• Talented, hard-working colleagues who genuinely care about delivering quality results. • The company has strong brand recognition and a long history in the photo/video industry. • Opportunities to take ownership of complex projects and develop cross-functional skills.

Cons

Across my time with the company, I experienced several leadership and communication challenges that affected team morale, clarity, and psychological safety: • Unclear expectations and inconsistent communication: Project success criteria and performance expectations were often not clearly defined, leading to misalignment, rework, and uncertainty about priorities. • Feedback lacked structure and consistency: Performance feedback was irregular and frequently non-constructive. When guidance was given, it tended to be broad criticism rather than actionable steps for improvement. • Difficulty obtaining clarification when needed: Team members often struggled to receive timely clarification on responsibilities or project direction, making it harder to understand the full scope of their roles. • Discouraged escalation and limited support: At times, employees felt discouraged from bringing concerns to HR or other support channels, creating an environment where individuals hesitated to seek fair resolution. • Meetings used in ways that increased stress: Meetings were sometimes scheduled under one expectation but then used to discuss unrelated issues or deliver prolonged criticism, contributing to anxiety and reduced trust. • Perceived inconsistency in how opportunities and scrutiny were applied: Certain employees appeared to receive preferential treatment while others faced harsher scrutiny without transparent justification. This imbalance affected morale and trust in leadership.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All