Great culture and teamwork, but low pay and recognition issues - Anonymous employee Brooks Running Employee Review

3.0
10 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good culture & genuine connection with really engaging teams across all functions. Great energy & true desire to solve problems together.

Cons

Consistent devaluing of employees who are not part of the product teams. Meaningful recognition of accomplishments at work and appropriate compensation rates are severely lacking. Expect salaries to hover around 80% of market median, which is already too low, then bump up less than a COLA each year.

Explore other reviews about Brooks Running

5.0
16 Jun 2026
Anonymous contractor
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- excellent employee perks - gorgeous HQ office buildings with amenities - free lunch - supportive and passionate team members

Cons

- parking is not free for employees, but there are commuter benefits to offset that

2.0
13 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The company offers some genuinely great perks, including free lunch, a beautiful office location, and a generous employee discount. I also genuinely enjoy my role and the work I get to do. The projects are challenging, rewarding, and provide opportunities to learn and contribute in meaningful ways. The product itself is something employees can be proud of, which makes the day-to-day work more engaging.

Cons

One of the biggest challenges is the lack of accountability among some employees, which can create frustration for those who consistently perform at a high level. Leadership transparency is also an issue. Employees talk to one another, and when information shared by management later proves inaccurate or misleading, it damages trust and credibility. Career growth opportunities are limited, with little visibility into long-term advancement or clear career paths. Compensation also tends to lag behind comparable employers in the area, making retention more difficult. The recent move from three required in-office days to four has also negatively impacted morale. Three days felt like a reasonable balance between collaboration and flexibility. With compensation below market and increasing in-office requirements, employees may find themselves comparing opportunities at larger companies that offer higher pay, stronger career mobility, and more accessible commuting options.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All