employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Comprehensive Women's Health

Is this your company?

Okay - Nurse Practitioner Comprehensive Women's Health Employee Review

1.0
15 Feb 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Concept is great works well.

Cons

Poor compensation. And benefits are expensive.

Explore other reviews about Comprehensive Women's Health

5.0
17 Oct 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

very accommodating, nice office, Friendly staff

Cons

single specialty, understaffed, limited patients

2.0
3 Sept 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

• No nights, weekends, or holidays. • Some truly incredible MAs and nurses who support one another despite the circumstances. • A chance to serve women’s health patients across a broad spectrum of needs. • Smaller-practice environment compared to a hospital, which could have been a positive if leadership supported it.

Cons

• Extremely high turnover: more than 65 people in the past two years, leaving departments perpetually short-staffed and disorganized. • Severe micromanagement and petty leadership (e.g., logging out of phones/computers for restroom breaks, strict clock-in monitoring, constant policing). • Inadequate training; new hires are left to “figure it out” while providers expect you to already know their extensive, individual preferences. • Raises are denied, pay is well below local RN market rates, and there are no incentives to perform well. • Gossip is rampant; staff morale is low because management constantly overlooks or mistreats good employees. • Pregnant employees receive only 4 weeks to recover if under a year of employment, and those unable to return at 4 weeks are terminated. • PTO is subpar (1 week in year one) and slowly increases every 12 months with capped leave without pay. • RN role is more clerical than clinical — primarily secretarial tasks (sorting faxes, referrals, scheduling, phone calls, prescription refills, lab results) with little true nursing practice. • Unsafe clinical practices observed, including unmonitored interventions and limited patient evaluations, with nurses expected to defer to ED rather than provide comprehensive care. • Some providers discourage direct questions, insisting staff rely on peers or protocols, creating unsafe and unsupported learning conditions. • Management changes have only increased micromanagement instead of improving culture. • Practice administrator and certain providers foster a culture of intimidation rather than support. • Two-week notices are not honored; resigning staff are often pushed out immediately.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All