employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Distress Centre Calgary

Is this your company?

Growing too quickly, beware - Anonymous employee Distress Centre Calgary Employee Review

2.0
19 Jul 2024
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Fulfilling work, free food, supportive co-workers, growth opportunities, respected organization to gain experience to work elsewhere in the field or to apply for grad school, diversity is prioritized

Cons

Disorganized management, high and unclear expectations, constant changes with little to no documentation to keep track, punitive and micromanaging culture, toxicity, broken communication pathways, outdated training or sometimes no training, incompetent HR, frustrating tech issues, little follow through. Constantly having more things added to your plate and being punished if you miss anything. High staff turnover makes these issues worse over time, even seasoned staff are struggling.

Explore other reviews about Distress Centre Calgary

3.0
15 Nov 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great colleagues, we can work remotely or onsite

Cons

The CEO is disrespectful to certain departments. The management team is inexperienced and has no knowledge of how to treat people with respect. Used to be a great place to work but in the last 6 months have been terrible

3.0
6 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

If you are Canadian born or fit the organization’s visible minority DEI categories, this can be an excellent place to start your career. There is initial training, and the real learning comes from speaking with service users. The moments when you can genuinely support someone in crisis are deeply meaningful and rewarding. From the outside, this environment has the potential to be exceptional.

Cons

My experience as a white immigrant with an accent was markedly different. I consistently felt like an outsider who did not fit any of the organization’s DEI boxes, and this shaped how I was perceived and treated. Feedback was often belittling, inconsistent, or delivered without clear documentation. Expectations shifted without warning. Concerns were reframed rather than addressed. The contrast between how included some staff felt and how excluded others were was stark. This created a two tier experience: those who fit the preferred categories often thrived, while those in the “middle space” — not Canadian born, not visibly diverse, and not protected by any category — faced disproportionate scrutiny and marginalization.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All