Great Mission - Terrible Leadership - Anonymous employee Diversion Hub Employee Review

1.0
28 Oct 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1. Great mission and genuine feeling like you’re making a difference 2. Staff doing the actual work go above and beyond for clients 3. PTO 4. Benefits

Cons

1. Leadership acts like mean girls in high school - will talk poorly and unprofessionally about you being closed doors but be kind to your face 2. Focus on older foundational programs are lost due to new programs coming in. No support and structure at all. 3. Immature leadership. Not sure how certain people made it so far. Not sure if any of them have any nonprofit leadership experience except for one. 4. No growth development 5. Cultish mindset 6. Low pay and weird about salary transparency 7. Safety concerns. Staff with other job descriptions handle escalated and disgruntled clients instead of specific hired and trained personnel. 8. Leadership cares more about clients than employees, yet you will never actually see executive leadership client facing if not for a camera op.

Explore other reviews about Diversion Hub

5.0
20 Nov 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Start-up energy; collaborative; growth opportunities.

Cons

Not many cons--the organization is still in its early growth phase.

2.0
14 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great benefits, kindness and empathy among staff members, and an ability to form meaningful relationships with clients and peers. A wonderful mission doing incredible and fulfilling work.

Cons

1)While the organization does meaningful work and many employees are passionate about the mission, my experience with workplace culture and leadership was disappointing and toxic. 2)One thing I noticed was favoritism. Advancement opportunities did not always feel tied to performance or qualifications, and internal mobility felt inconsistent. It felt that those who “tattled” on their peers were the one’s who were raised up for promotions, and those who were socially aligned with leadership received more opportunities. 3)Training and onboarding were also lacking. Employees were frequently thrown into the position with minimal structure or support, which created unnecessary stress and inconsistency. 4)Another concern was professionalism within leadership. Communication at times felt overly political, and there was a noticeable lack of trust among staff. Gossip, poor conflict management, and a culture of backchannel communication negatively affected morale. 5)This workplace may be a good fit for some people, especially those who thrive in fast-paced environments with minimal structure. However, I believe the organization would benefit greatly from stronger leadership development, clearer training processes, more transparent promotion practices, and a healthier team culture.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All