Elanco Review - Information Technology Elanco Employee Review

3.0
16 Apr 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great manager and team! Excellent PTO.

Cons

A lot of work is done by vendors, not in house. The company has a lot of work that needs to be done to improve processes. There are no admins for departments, so seems like you are always doing a lot of admin work, instead of focusing on your main job. The company now mandates 30 days working in office per quarter. Difficult to move up in the organization. There has recently been lay offs, and I am afraid there will be more coming.

avatar
Elanco Response
2y
Thank you for sharing your feedback. With our standup and integration behind us, Elanco is well positioned to launch our most exciting pipeline in our 70-year history. As we look to 2025 and beyond, we are focused on sustained revenue growth, delivering our innovation pipeline, and improved cash conversion.

Explore other reviews about Elanco

5.0
14 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Management listens to their emoloyees. Great benefits.

Cons

Old equipment. Lots of forced ot for hourly employees

avatar
Elanco Response
3w
We appreciate your positive feedback regarding management and benefits. At Elanco, we are dedicated to the wellbeing of our employees and are always looking for opportunities for improvement - we thank you for your feedback!
2.0
20 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Plenty of great, passionate coworkers who work hard and collaborate. I had a lot of professional flexibility and my job was always interesting. Process teams on the manufacturing floor is a great system. Offsite resources, especially technical experts, are great.

Cons

Expect to be firefighting constantly and frequently fighting against an aging facility and outdated processes. No unified vision or clear prioritization from management. Misalignment between site leadership and upper/off-site management created sustained operational friction and stress for employees. Leadership turnover was frequent, contributing to ongoing instability. Because of all this, there was a super low morale and a feeling of widespread fatigue. Inconsistent communication and decision-making standards contributed to a low-trust culture, including regular informal discussion of colleagues and unprofessional and sometimes intimidating behavior in meetings. Performance feedback and perceived value were highly dependent on shifting leadership dynamics rather than consistent, objective criteria. Employees could move from being strongly supported to heavily criticized with little change in actual performance. Although a nine-box review process was supposedly used, individual outcomes were not transparently shared with employees. Onboarding and training for specialized roles were underdeveloped. Compensation was just fine for workload and scope of responsibility.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All