Pros
Benefits are average, and employees get access to a lot of cool events and opportunities in DC. Salaries can be competitive depending on the position, though raises and promotions can be hard to come by. Some minor flexibility in workplace scheduling and work-from-home opportunities are offered. Professional development opportunities may be available depending on your departure and manager.
Cons
First, it is important to note that the CEO listed, Gregory O’Dell, is no longer at Events DC. As of October 2022, Angie Gates is the current CEO. Under Gates’ leadership over the past two years, Events DC has become a bad place to work in every way. Starting from the first days of her administration, a culture of blame, fear, incompetence, and corruption has festered. Events DC has become the poster child for a toxic work environment. Gates has made it clear since she started that the sole focus of Events DC’s activities and initiatives should be to center her at every opportunity. This has meant an attempt to make Gates the face of Events DC, showing up in nearly every social media post and public appearance as the sole representative of the company. While one could argue that this is part of the responsibilities of a CEO, it cannot be stressed strongly enough how much of a departure this is from previous CEOs and extent to which employees’ time and company resources are incessantly diverted to the needs of the CEO above all else. Hundreds of thousands of dollars are spent each year in the effort to showcase Gates at every opportunity. Over her tenure, she and senior leadership have taken lavish vacations on company funds to far-reaching destinations around the world purportedly in the name of pursuing business opportunities back in DC. Large sums of public funds are diverted to provide luxurious perks to Gates that were not given to previous CEOs. The result is that the organization’s number one priority in recent years is to serve the CEO’s wants over all other needs. It has become a business structured to satisfy one person’s ego over all else. The toxic environment has trickled down to all levels of employees. Fear permeates nearly every interaction amongst departments and colleagues. Rules, regulations, and expectations regularly change without being communicated, and employees are then ridiculed publicly for their failure to comply with rules that they couldn’t possibly have known about. Communication has been horrendous throughout Gates’ tenure at all levels of the company, and there are no signs that that will change. The fueling of the CEO’s ego has tangible consequences for all employees, not just those in close proximity to Gates. Over the past two years, there has been an extraordinary level of turnover across the company. Most executives in place when Gates took power have left or been fired, and many lower level employees have followed. In my opinion, most of the employees who left were extremely talented, diligent, and believed deeply in the mission of the company. Few talented employees remain, and those that do are eager to leave as soon as possible. The departures are a brain drain that even under the best of circumstances would be difficult to replace. While turnover under new leadership can always be expected, this was fueled by a toxic and antagonistic work environment, led by the CEO, that makes staying impossible even for more junior employees. These departures were replaced, of course, but the result was as damaging as could be imagined. Gates, who came from a previous posting at the Office of Cable Television, Film, Music and Entertainment (OCTFME), brought many of her former colleagues and friends with her to Events DC. Many, if not most, of these individuals were under-qualified for their positions, getting high level titles and assuming ownership over departments or responsibilities that they lacked the requisite experience to lead. The people that assumed these roles have similar personalities and characteristics to Gates, resulting in a deeply rooted culture of under-qualified, insecure, and vindictive management that assert themselves forcefully over their subordinates and take full advantage of having the backing of the CEO to act as they please. Among many departments, there are almost no new hires over the last two years that did not come from OCTFME or have some type of existing relationship with Gates or her appointed executives. If you are considering working at Events DC and did not already establish that relationship, you may genuinely be out of luck. Many hiring efforts over the last few years have been a charade, leading on well-qualified candidates through the hiring process only to go with the under-qualified, pre-determined candidate that the position was designed for. Whether it is employment with the company or contracts for procurement vendors, the company has become a haven for Gates’ friends to do as they please and extract the resources of District of Columbia taxpayers. For those who have stayed at Events DC amongst this radical internal change, the only way to get ahead at the company has been to suck up to leadership completely. Those who have “played the game” and acted in deference to the whims of leadership have been rewarded with promotions while those who have regularly exceeded expectations but are not favored by the administration are regularly overlooked. Those who do not act in total deference are met with active hostility and are brushed aside. It is an open secret than many, including senior leadership installed by the CEO, are quite fed up with the direction of the company, yet few to none speak up for fear of retribution. I, like many others, joined Events DC because of its role in some of the most enjoyable and impactful activities in our city. The many venues, signature events, and general impact uplifting the city of DC and us residents makes it an extremely enticing place to work. For a while, it was that, and that mission stood at the heart of the company. Today, the same cannot be said. Priorities are very often driven by the personal whims of the CEO, regardless of business or community impact. Priority for sponsorship and procurement contracts is regularly given to the friends and allies of the CEO. It is a place where the mission that brought most of us to the company has been lost in favor of the whims of the CEO. I write all of this as a warning to those considering joining Events DC. For some of you considering applying for certain positions at the company, much of this is of little consequence to you in your role. For many others, however, especially those considering management positions or jobs with closer proximity to leadership, I would warn against Events DC in the strongest possible terms. It is a vindictive, egotistical, fear-driven culture led by a posse of deeply insecure individuals. It is not a place where most people can find the rewarding, positive working environment they desire. I long for the day when this company will again focus on serving the people of DC, but for now Events DC has its priorities elsewhere.