Don't Work Here--Too Much Greed - Human Factors Scientist Exponent Employee Review

2.0
11 Jul 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1) The base salary is good, not excellent, however raises and bonuses are minimal and you will work long hours. 2) You'll work with the latest and greatest technology/ideas from a vast array of different companies. 3) Every single day is different in terms of what you'll be doing which makes the overall job supremely interesting. Some of the tasks themselves on the other hand aren't so interesting.

Cons

1) Nettlesome work environment. Coworkers are the competition with whom you will compete on performance metrics which of course translates to receiving (or not receiving!) bonuses, raises, and promotions. Problematically, coworkers are ALSO the ones from whom you are supposed to find work. It is a total conflict of interest—asking to get work from those with whom you compete. Because work does not come directly from clients, there is an extremely limited pool of people from whom you can get work and they aren’t inclined to give it to you for sake of their own interests unless they have extra (“work hoarding” happens during slow times of the year). If you don't manage to find any work, it counts against you so you'll either be trying to find work or have too much work to do which is extremely stressful. I have also witnessed lots of back-stabbing, credit-stealing and petty games going on due to the competitive work environment coupled with fake smiles. This is the number one reason working at Exponent is difficult. Instead of the traditional business model of having a boss hand down work or even having a team that all has a common goal, you will be expected to find your own work *internally* and work with people who are working against you. 2) Unchallenging science. Often the type of tasks that are done for projects are tedious, simple things. Frequently the work performed does not require a PhD whatsoever. This can seem like a plus to not have to do super cognitively-demanding tasks, but then one realizes they’re mostly doing a myriad of tiresome and unexciting tasks. Over time, while you’ll work with the latest technology in industry, your own personal hard-earned skills as a scientist will wane. There is some opportunity to be creative in how to tackle particular tasks. 3) Finally, this isn't really a long-term job. You’ll become a jack of *many* trades but master of none. You do whatever work comes in and you will like it (or you can quit!). Some projects are legitimately interesting, others are not, but that is the nature of consulting work—Exponent will take any project no matter how meaningless it is as long as it helps pay the bills. If one expects to specialize and become a true expert at something (which a PhD student is typically driven to do) you do not want to stay at Exponent and instead apply to a company that specifically does the type of work you want to do. There is no passion for the work here at this company, it's all about the money. Why else would PhD graduates forego pursuing topics of their own interest in an academic setting other than being offered a lot more money than what an academic position would offer? Notice that most of the company is filled with younger employees despite being around since the 60’s and you’ll realize the turnover rate must be high—it’s also why they’re constantly recruiting and trying to hire. I don't get the sense they're overly interested in retaining talent so much as just finding new talent. It's alarming that fresh PhD students are the targets for recruitment rather than seasoned professionals.

avatar
Exponent Response
5y
The development of our consulting staff is one of the highest priority initiatives across the firm from top (Board, CEO, Officers) to the staff level. We expect employees to own their own development and there are many, varied paths forward. And we provide them with training, programs and processes that are continuously evolving to support them on their paths. Whether it is participation in our Buddy, Mentoring or Sponsorship Programs or online and classroom training or informal development through on-the-job exposure to a wide variety of challenging problems and client interactions, this is a top priority. We have a total compensation philosophy that is based on pay for performance. Performance is measured across three equally critical expectations of Professional, Business/Client and Leadership/Teamwork.

Explore other reviews about Exponent

5.0
17 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good benefits and great culture

Cons

Inconsistent workload but partly due to the nature of the business

2
2.0
9 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Many consultants successfully use Exponent as a stepping stone to larger tech companies. The project work can sometimes be very interesting and some consultants appreciate overtime and bonuses for long hours (albeit many feel they would earn more overall compensation at larger tech companies).

Cons

The company has very high expectations of its consultants and doesn't always provide the resources necessary to achieve their expectations. In order to grow after the first few years, consultants are generally expected to generate their own business, but some junior consultants feel they are not fairly given credit for business they help bring in. Many consultants feel the performance rewards are too delayed.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All