Avoid if you can - Clinical Operations Fortrea Employee Review

2.0
22 Sept 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Friendly colleagues Good salary Remote availabilities

Cons

I have been working in the industry for over 12 years and time spent in Fortrea was the worst time in my career for the following reasons: 1. Low experience of some CRAs/IN-CRAs causing clinical leads to explain the basics of clinical trials for studies with already low FTE for clinical leads (when you tried to raise it with your LM, you were blamed and asked to me more tolerant). 2. Poor processes and poor automation of the parts that could have been easily automated leading to lots of manual work 3. Workload very high causing often times to work for 10-12 hours/day 4. Lack of support from line mangers - they basically don't care and try to shift the blame to employees in case of any issues 5. Extra processes which are time-consuming e.g. forecast management which cannot be billed to client leading to extra work 6. Account Directors pleasing the client only with low regard for employees, asking for extra work from already overworked employees 7. Constant fear of layoffs and sudden loss of team members due to layoffs Note: I left within a year as the whole culture was just toxic. If you are looking for a job in clinical research come here if you are desperate only and need to put money on the table. My mental health was very poor when working in Fortrea. I had 2 people leaving without new roles secured as it was too much for them. I could not afford it.

Explore other reviews about Fortrea

5.0
2 Oct 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great people, good pay, good work life balance.

Cons

I can't think of any.

1.0
15 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

In my experience, the greatest benefit of working here was the breadth of exposure I gained across my function. That said, much of it came out of necessity rather than design. Due to what I observed as persistent understaffing, high turnover, and recurring rounds of layoffs, I found myself taking on responsibilities that stretched well beyond any defined scope. If you're someone who learns by doing and can tolerate ambiguity, you will walk away having touched more than you would in a more stable environment. Benefits were adequate, though it was my experience that the company announced plans to eliminate dependent coverage starting in 2027, which was a meaningful shift for employees with families.

Cons

In my time here, I found role clarity to be nearly nonexistent. I went without a formal job description for the duration of my tenure, and despite raising it, leadership indicated for well over a year that it was being worked on. That pattern, in my opinion, reflected a broader cultural issue: change was frequent but poorly managed, and directional guidance from leadership felt inconsistent and at times difficult to trust. I personally felt that communication about the company's position and direction was not always straightforward. The organization also appeared, in my view, to default to workforce reductions as a primary business lever rather than investing in stabilization or accountability. When leadership gaps surfaced, my experience was that they were minimized rather than addressed directly. The culture within my dept was also something I struggled with. In my experience, there was significant misalignment around ownership and responsibility, and the dynamic felt more competitive than collaborative. Rather than pulling in the same direction, it often felt like individuals within the team worked against one another rather than in cooperation, which made an already challenging environment that much harder to navigate.

6
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All