employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Freestone Capital Management

Engaged employer

Approach with caution - Sr Associste Freestone Capital Management Employee Review

1.0
27 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Nice office and some of your coworkers are good people

Cons

Where do I start. The office politics play a big role in the limited lateral mobility that there is in this company. If you think you’re going to move up quickly and create a great career for yourself please think again. Nepotism is not rampant but certainly exists. Many of the senior advisors are gone for long periods of time and hardly have any idea what goes on inside the company. They talk big game about great culture and opportunities but I can assure you this firms culture is probably the worst there is when it comes to the finance space in Seattle. Lots of gossip around the office and just a sleazy vibe, something you would expect more from a broker dealer not an RIA. I’ve since moved to a competitor and am shocked at the culture difference, It’s like night and day. I didn’t even realize how bad it was until I left and experienced something different. Anyone early in their career do not touch freestone with a ten foot pole… plenty of other great options in the PNW market.

Explore other reviews about Freestone Capital Management

5.0
12 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I've been here at Freestone for many years. My colleagues and the culture here have been fantastic. No place is perfect, but I feel truly cared for by those around me, and it has been a gift to be able to work with this group of people here. Freestone is one of the few companies where I've seen people genuinely invest in each other's success. The collaborative environment isn't performative, it actually shows up in how teams share knowledge, support one another through busy stretches, playful banter in the office, and celebrating wins together. One thing that stands out to me after being here for as long as I have is watching people continue to advance and grow into roles well beyond where they started. For example, a lot of my colleagues who came in as Client Services team members are now Client Advisors managing their own client relationships, others leading departments, and others have moved into entirely different areas of Freestone where both a need and an opportunity aligned. Other things that I've loved all these years: Great clients, great Client Service, Investments, and Wealth Planning teams, employee retreats to great places and other fun events during the year, a meaningful profit sharing program and other bonus opportunities outside of regular comp, awesome office locations, lunches 4 days a week in office, hybrid work options, and the best 401K matching I've seen at an RIA.

Cons

The pace can be demanding at times given the high level of service we provide to clients, and growth sometimes outpaces the infrastructure needed to support it, but know this is being addressed with expanded coverage.

1
1.0
24 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Freestone has a strong client base and a recognizable name in the Seattle market. You’ll get exposure to complex client situations and build experience quickly due to the workload. There are also good people across the firm at the peer level who try to support each other and do quality work despite the broader challenges.

Cons

The most concerning issue is leadership—specifically how poor management is handled. A recent example involved a senior leader who was promoted into a role overseeing the client service function despite clear concerns about their management style and effectiveness. The result was a noticeable decline in team morale, increased turnover, and a breakdown in communication and support for the client service team. Rather than addressing the issue decisively, leadership allowed the situation to persist for far too long. When action was finally taken, the individual was quietly moved out of the role instead of being held accountable in a meaningful way. That decision sent a clear message internally: performance and impact on people are secondary to optics and internal politics. This kind of approach creates a lack of trust in leadership. Issues are not addressed proactively, and when they are, the resolution often feels incomplete. It reinforces the perception that management is insulated from consequences, while the rest of the organization is expected to operate at a high level regardless of the environment. Combined with heavy workloads, limited resources, and compensation that doesn’t fully align with expectations, it becomes difficult to see a long-term path here. Many strong employees ultimately leave—not because of the work itself, but because of how leadership handles (or fails to handle) situations like this.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All