A good resume builder, but staying too long will stagnate your growth, - Senior Financial Analyst Georgia-Pacific Employee Review

2.0
3 Mar 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Company has ample resources and it’s privately held, which is great. There are some very smart employees here and the paychecks never bounce.

Cons

Company doesn’t follow the guiding principles that they preach. It’s definitely about who you know and not what you know. Also, don’t expect any raises unless you plan on moving around at their request. Pay starts great but rarely adjusts upwards from there.

avatar
Georgia-Pacific Response
4y
Thank you for all your hard work and dedication at GP. We also appreciate you taking the time to share your experience and leave us feedback. I am disappointed to read of your experience as it is the expectation that compensation is reviewed annually between employee and manager. In addition, we also expect that all employees are being stewards of our MBM culture. As a current employee, I encourage you to share your concerns and feedback with your supervisor or HR contact. Please know I’ll be passing this review along to the appropriate leadership teams as feedback. Thank you again, Cali from Talent Solutions.

Explore other reviews about Georgia-Pacific

5.0
30 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good pay, good benefits, stable job

Cons

Lots of travel, very corporate

2.0
7 Jul 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Talented and hardworking electricians, operators, mechanics, and plant personnel. Interesting automation and controls work with opportunities to solve challenging technical problems. Significant autonomy at the local level when responding to production issues. Good compensation and benefits. Corporate engineering resources are knowledgeable and generally willing to help.

Cons

Expectations and priorities frequently changed without corresponding adjustments to workload. Performance feedback lacked important operational context, such as competing priorities, project reassignment, and resource constraints. Communication tended to favor frequent meetings over clear written expectations. Accommodation requests and communication support were difficult to navigate and lacked a clear process. Single-engineer staffing model creates a challenging environment for vacations, medical appointments, training, and long-term sustainability. Heavy emphasis on immediate deliverables can make long-term engineering work and root-cause analysis difficult.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All