Leadership needs to learn how to lead - Software Engineer Handshake Employee Review

2.0
15 Apr 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Handshake's best asset is its people. There are tons of motivated people who really believe in Handshake's mission. -The tech stack is a bit of a mixed bag, with some areas being very modern while others are stuck in the past. This is typical for a tech company though and Handshake is making strides to improve the coding environment for its developers. - Work life balance is also decent. It used to be much better before some of the more recent culture changes happened, but it’s still not bad.

Cons

Upper leadership's ability to lead and inspire is minimal. Upper leadership has made several top-down decisions recently with what seems like little thought as to how the people impacted by their decisions will be affected. Then when leadership gets negative feedback on their decisions, they seem to act surprised like they hadn't considered that decision might not be popular. Furthermore, there seems to be no accountability for upper leadership. The effectiveness of upper leadership's decisions and initiatives are not tracked anywhere visibly, and if their decision has a negative impact there appear to be no consequences. In short it often feels like leadership doesn't know how to lead and they are figuring it out as they go. Leadership’s recent attempt to change Handshake's culture seems like a massive misstep. Leadership did not provide much detail for what they wanted the new culture to be except for "performance" and they did not describe what it was about the old culture they were trying to improve.

Explore other reviews about Handshake

5.0
12 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Work at your own pace.

Cons

Task limit when new to project.

1.0
22 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Challenging, interesting position in the short term.

Cons

The company has implemented a new timer policy that has “active” and “inactive” time on the backend that makes up for the total time. We were getting paid by total time (as you should), but HAI has changed it to only pay contributors for the time marked “active.” Time is “active” when scrolling, typing, and clicking within the specific task tab. Time is “inactive” when none of the previous actions are happening; i.e., when reading the task without moving the mouse or pressing keys, researching in another tab, etc. It sounds like they have changed the rules to only pay for active time, which has caused huge pay discrepancies. The percentage of inactive time is usually way more than active time on these timers due to the amount of reading, visual analyzing, thinking, and research required for some tasks. This behavior is unacceptable because time that seems “inactive” is still important to the quality and completion of tasks. They keep throwing accusations like “time thieves” around to justify it. If you respect yourself, pack it up and go somewhere else. I know most people who work at these places are desperate for income, but that’s exactly what they’re hoping for. They’re hoping you will be desperate enough to be taken advantage of.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All