Lesson learned - Anonymous employee Hatch Employee Review

2.0
11 Mar 2014
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Salary, benefits. (see note on vacations in Cons).

Cons

- Hatch is like a modern day sweatshop - only difference is that they do engineering/consulting work. Everything is driven by project work for clients. Once there are no projects, you are out of there .(HR may try to tell they otherwise - that they are employee focused, and they value their resources, etc., etc.) - You spend too much time learning *hatch-isms* - would be better off learning generic technology, but Hatch's system is so convoluted, you get lost trying to keep up. - Have to give up ~10 vacation days each season for Christmas shutdown! What??? - Late evening/night meetings -> this is OK except there is no official way to account for the time spent working extra time.

Explore other reviews about Hatch

5.0
1 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

great work environment, very communicative and collaborative. Easy and open communication with PMs and upper leadership.

Cons

need to be proactive to get work, especially if you're new. lot of travel, pro or con depending on your outlook.

1
3.0
18 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Exceptional project exposure across major U.S. transit, infrastructure, and energy pursuits — the portfolio and client roster are genuinely impressive and great for your professional brand The LTK Engineering Services acquisition brought in a strong, collaborative office culture that is noticeably more grounded and people-focused than the broader Hatch Ltd (Canadian entity) culture Strong brand recognition in the A/E/C space that opens doors with major public agencies

Cons

Hired under the Client Action Team structure, which led to significant instability — multiple management changes in a short period with little transparency or consistency Overlapping time zones and regional boundaries create constant coordination friction; the flat hierarchy sounds good on paper but breaks down quickly when accountability is unclear and no one owns decisions Zero flexibility on in-office requirements — no hybrid accommodation even when the nature of the work doesn't require it Promotions are not merit-based. Advancement appears tied to visibility metrics like road safety observations and office attendance rather than the quality or impact of your work — deeply frustrating for high performers

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All