postdoc positions are not worth it - Postdoctoral Scientist IARC Employee Review

2.0
4 Sept 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Postdoc stipend is €2950 which is generally better than local postdocs. International collaboration opportunities.

Cons

Progression is almost impossible. Stipends do not increase each year, nor do they change depending upon experience. If you have a bad supervisor it will never get better; harassment etc is rarely dealt with even though repeat offences are widely known. Management treat postdocs like PhD students; some postdocs are unable to attend courses/conferences due to budgetary constraints. Staff at the level just above postdocs perform the same duties but are paid more than twice as much and have a wider array of benefits not available to postdocs; management rarely include these positions in grants because postdocs are "cheap labour" in comparison. There are numerous administrative barriers which make research slow and cumbersome; a lack of administrative staff in the fellowship office means postdocs do not get the support they need, especially those from LMICs. Researchers considering a postdoc at IARC should contact the Early Career Scientist Association (ecsa@iarc.who.int) to get a better idea of the current situation before applying.

Explore other reviews about IARC

5.0
9 Mar 2014
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

international environment; bridge epidemiology and molecular biology

Cons

progress within the agency may be challenging

2.0
22 Nov 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good colleagues, inclusive atmosphere, motivated sales people

Cons

Lots of micromanaging, lots of gossip

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All