employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Integra LifeSciences

Engaged employer

Disappointing leadership with Poor Human Resources Support - Anonymous employee Integra LifeSciences Employee Review

1.0
26 Jul 2017
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1. Impactful products that employees can be proud of 2. Employees who want to make a deference if they truly had the tools, resources and management support 3,. Good company growth

Cons

1.. Very high turnover that causes poor engagement and dysfunction within the company and departments. 2. Poor senior leaders who are unable or unwilling to represent the company's values and support their employees 3. A horribly dysfunctional Human Resources function with a CHRO who is one of the weakest leaders on the ELT team. She has created a team with high turnover, low engagement, inability to achieve positive change and a poor overall company reputation. Very disappointing because if Integra had an impactful HR group and CHRO leader, some of its negative issues could be addressed. 4. Compensation program that is not competitive

Explore other reviews about Integra LifeSciences

5.0
22 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Salary and commission were great.

Cons

I have nothing negative to say

1.0
18 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

To provide a balanced perspective, one positive aspect was the company's willingness to offer flexible work arrangements.

Cons

I would encourage prospective employees to carefully evaluate the company culture before joining. In my experience, the work environment lacked the level of professionalism and collaborative leadership I expected. Leadership decisions at the senior level often appeared to be driven by personal viewpoints rather than objective discussion and open engagement. Employees who did not align with the preferred direction could experience resistance rather than constructive dialogue. The culture felt more aligned with a "my way or the highway" management style than a collaborative and inclusive approach. I also experienced situations where information communicated about my performance appeared inconsistent with my actual work contributions and outcomes. Rather than constructive feedback supported by objective metrics and open discussion, I felt there were instances where narratives surrounding performance were inaccurate or misrepresented. This created concerns regarding transparency, accountability, and the overall feedback process. The company has also faced regulatory challenges in the past, which may be worth researching independently as part of your due diligence process. My experience ultimately did not align with my expectations for leadership, transparency, and organizational culture.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All