-Students are friendly, approachable, and create a sense of community.
-Great coworkers and colleagues willing to support each other.
-Manageable workload.
-Collaborative opportunities with staff and faculty pending the department.
Cons
-Leadership was questionable and at times unorganized.
-Leadership was often invisible and took a "hands off approach" when it came time to being visible and present in the community.
-Often critiqued more than provided helpful feedback and guidance.
-Experienced microaggressions here-cultural competency is needed as some individuals seemed to have trouble working with people who look, learn, and were outside of the status quo
-Department was cliquey and showed favoritism to individuals they supervised.