Pros
Some of the most exciting engineering I've done. We're building at the edge of agentic AI, and because legal AI moves so fast, almost every new advance in the field is immediately applicable to what we ship — it doesn't rot in a research backlog. The strategic bet is genuinely contrarian: while the well-funded players (Harvey, Legora) chase the SaaS playbook, we're betting on services-as-software — using AI to actually deliver the legal outcome, not just sell a tool to lawyers. Whether or not you'd place that bet yourself, it makes the problems here more interesting than most.
The people are the other draw — smart, low-ego, and genuinely friendly. There's a real social side too: plenty of events, beers after work, the whole thing. Autonomy is high and you ship fast; scope is there for the taking, and people do get promoted — progression is real and merit-based, not a tenure thing. If you're driven, self-directed and high-agency, the upside is well rewarded.
Cons
It's a scale-up and it feels like one. The pace is high, change is constant, and there are stretches of genuinely hard work — go in expecting that. Some benefits are still missing relative to larger companies, there's been some churn, and processes are still maturing for the size we're at. None of it surprised me for this stage, but it's worth knowing: this isn't a settle-in-and-coast environment.