McKesson Patient Care Solutions Breast Pump Team - Anonymous employee McKesson Employee Review

1.0
30 Nov 2017
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The Vitality program helped to make benefits affordable, while also offering incentives to stay healthy.

Cons

Managers with the Breast Pump team play favorites and allow the favorites to do as they please without penalty. Decisions for the team are not well thought out, and made without any regard to how it may affect team members or clients alike. Of the 5 or 6 managers that work in that particular department, maybe only 2 step up to be around and help when needed. In the end, I had to leave since I didn't want to play into the popularity contest. HR has been notified multiple times (by multiple people) of the wrongful things going on and nothing has been done. Many people left or would like to leave because they feel as though by speaking up or saying anything remotely negative will rock the boat and cause terrible consequences for themselves. If you don't suck up to management, they make your every day at work a living hell... only to then gather at the end (or middle) of the work day to laugh about it and talk about anyone and everyone with your favorited peers. Managers will share private information or things that otherwise should never be told to someone who is not management to the favorites of the department. If you value yourself, do not work here!

Explore other reviews about McKesson

5.0
26 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible schedule Good leadership Supportive team

Cons

Hard to move up Customers can be difficult

1.0
3 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1. relatively aloof culture for ICs to grow on their own 2. on and off few people are good 3. Actually consultants in india are better than some full time hires to work with. The h1bs in full time roles and some GCs/Americans are just 1 step away from unemployment line but there are some good quality consultants who can be directed well to bring in good work. Problem is lack of direction when middle management is just running after money.

Cons

1. top most management is clueless to what is going post the middle tier 2. middle tiers - VPs/SVPs/Directors and Sr. Directors are among the worst. Mostly cast offs from Consulting firms/Tech cos/Other Healthcare firms, this group has some of the worst, clueless folks who just think very narrowly about how to get rid of problems, maybe craft a story for higher ups. Get rid of this layer ( so called people management ) and co. could shine better on the work of ICs, decent software engineers and regular rank and file. 3. Main money maker distribution is different from tech group and the IT here is almost comical - 2 years ago in 2024 there were "directors" bringing AI agents with 90% hallucination .. I mean that has got to be an industry first!

1
avatar
McKesson Response
3w
Thank you for bringing these issues to our attention. We are committed to creating a positive work environment and are disappointed to learn that we fell short. We are taking your feedback seriously and are making efforts to address the concerns raised. Please feel free to reach out for a more in-depth discussion.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All