employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Melbourne Water

Is this your company?

Avoid this place - Project Manager Melbourne Water Employee Review

1.0
12 Sept 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexibility was there but it has changed, they are know pushing people to be in the office .

Cons

1. Management / contractor ties are very strong, to a point were they can be family members. That is very toxic. 2. They run the team based on fake positivity, talking and resolving problems is not in the agenda. They want to sell that we are a happy family when there are fundamental issues in the team. 3. No growth at all. 4. if you are a passionate performer, they won't support you, they will overload you with a tonne of work and spend their time babysitting the non performers. 5. They love meetings because management has pretty little thing to do. 6. Tenders are not run on merits, they are run on politics. 7. There is a vast number of employees looking at retirement and they are proud to do as little as possible to stay in the status quo. 8. Too many GMs and Team Leaders, they don't know what they are doing. 9. Pay is a joke . 10. Flexibility is out of the equation. 11. They love talking about Safety but there are fundamental issues in the contractors side that they are ignoring and it has impacted people wellbeing. 12. all the benefits that they talk when they are hiring, you need so many conditions to get them. There is no investment in training and developing unless that you are part of the agenda. it is not based on merits.

Explore other reviews about Melbourne Water

5.0
10 Mar 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Money is nice to get

Cons

Money could be better to get

1.0
15 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Pay arrives on time every fortnight.

Cons

Working at Melbourne Water is a masterclass in how to turn a well-funded organisation into a productivity graveyard. The bureaucracy is so thick it actively smothers competence, initiative, and any remaining motivation an employee might arrive with. Management operates in a parallel universe where meetings replace outcomes and policy documents replace thinking. Decisions take months, accountability takes years, and responsibility somehow never lands upward. When things go wrong which they often do blame is quietly redistributed to whoever is least protected, not whoever made the call. Processes are convoluted for no reason other than tradition. Systems are outdated, communication is incoherent, and priorities change so often that long-term planning is effectively impossible. You’re expected to hit moving targets while being criticised for not standing still. Performance management feels arbitrary and defensive. Feedback is vague, reactive, and usually delivered only when someone needs a scapegoat. High performers are rewarded with more work and less support, while underperformers are preserved by the very systems meant to address them. The culture rewards compliance over competence. Question inefficiency and you’re labelled “difficult.” Try to improve something and you’ll be reminded that “this is how it’s always been done.” Over time, capable employees either burn out, shut up, or leave often replaced by process, not people. Morale is low, trust is lower, and the organisation feels more focused on protecting itself than delivering value or supporting staff.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All