its okay.. - Surplus Sales Lead PCs for People Employee Review

3.0
7 Nov 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

My manager was really nice

Cons

The role was marked by a severe lack of resources and consistent understaffing, requiring individuals to manage the workload of multiple roles. There was no formal training provided, and performance evaluations did not account for the structural challenges or unforeseen issues that arose.

avatar
PCs for People Response
7mo
Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. We’re sorry to hear that your experience didn’t reflect the supportive environment we strive to provide. We understand how challenging it can be to work in situations where staffing or resources feel limited, and we take concerns like these very seriously. Over the past several months, we’ve been actively reviewing team structures, hiring needs, and workflow processes to better align workloads with available resources. Ensuring that no one feels they are managing multiple roles without support is a priority for us. We also recognize the importance of structured training and fair, context-aware performance evaluations. We are currently strengthening our onboarding programs and providing managers with additional guidance to ensure evaluations reflect not just outcomes, but also the circumstances and constraints under which employees are working. Your feedback helps us improve, and we appreciate you bringing these issues to our attention. If you would be open to discussing your experience further, we’d welcome the opportunity to learn more.

Explore other reviews about PCs for People

5.0
21 Jan 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

This organization exists today because leadership was willing to make extremely hard decisions during a financial crisis. When ACP funding dropped from the primary source of revenue to zero almost overnight, the company was at real risk of failing. Instead of pretending everything was fine, leadership confronted reality, restructured quickly, and stabilized the organization. As a result, the company survived, became profitable, and has posted positive financial results last fiscal year and this fiscal year. That matters in the nonprofit space. At a time when many nonprofits are downsizing, closing programs, or shutting down entirely due to funding shortfalls, this organization is surviving, and in many ways, thriving. That outcome did not happen by accident.

Cons

The transition was difficult and not everyone experienced it positively. The culture necessarily changed when the organization shifted from a subsidy-dependent model to one focused on sustainability, accountability, and performance. Roles that existed under the previous model were no longer viable. Expectations increased. The pace was intense, and the pressure was real. Crisis leadership is rarely comfortable leadership.

1
avatar
PCs for People Response
1mo
Thank you for taking the time to share such a comprehensive and thoughtful review of your experience with us. Navigating the sudden loss of ACP funding was undoubtedly one of the most challenging chapters in our organization’s history. Your acknowledgment of the difficult, yet necessary, decisions made during that fiscal crisis means a lot to our leadership team. Navigating that shift required immense resilience from everyone involved. We appreciate your candid reflection on how the culture and expectations changed as we transitioned toward long-term sustainability. Crisis management is rarely comfortable, but as you noted, our primary focus had to be preserving our ability to serve our community and ensuring the organization's survival. Thank you also for your advice regarding communication. We agree that clear, transparent communication regarding financial realities is essential, especially during periods of rapid growth and stabilization. We are committed to carrying that practice forward as we continue to thrive.
1.0
25 Nov 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some coworkers try to help. Regular hours. A mission that could be good in theory.

Cons

Raising concerns will be misrepresented and used against you. Constant mismanagement and shifting expectations. Leadership is absent and workload distribution is inconsistent and unfair. Feedback is taken personally instead of addressed.

3
avatar
PCs for People Response
7mo
Thank you for sharing your perspective. We take all feedback seriously, even when we may not agree with the characterization of events. We want to reassure current and prospective employees that raising concerns is not only encouraged but essential to maintaining a healthy workplace. We have established channels for reporting issues, and we do not tolerate retaliation of any kind. When concerns are brought forward, they are reviewed objectively and handled in accordance with our policies. Regarding comments about leadership, expectations, and workload distribution: we recognize that clear communication and consistent management are critical. We are actively working to strengthen our training for supervisors, improve expectation-setting, and ensure more transparent workload balancing across teams. We also value constructive feedback and strive to address issues professionally rather than personally. Our goal is always to create an environment where employees feel heard and respected, even during challenging discussions. We are committed to fostering a fully supportive environment and expect all of our employees to communicate respectfully and appropriately. While we cannot discuss individual personnel matters, we can say that decisions related to conduct or performance follow careful review and established procedures. We appreciate your suggestions and will continue investing in training, accountability, and continuous improvement.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All