Good place to learn hustle - Talent Acquisition Pepper Content Employee Review

5.0
12 Aug 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Lot of opportunities to work and grow.. appreciation for the work… company events and offsite….. its been good 1+ year here at pepper and I have got a lot of experience and learnings.. some amazing folks to work with…

Cons

Nothing as such but sometimes workload affects your work life balance

avatar
Pepper Content Response
2y
We're thrilled to hear about your positive experiences at Pepper Content. Your contributions during your time with us were invaluable and greatly contributed to our success. We're grateful for your feedback. If you ever consider returning or have suggestions to make Pepper Content even better, we'd love to hear from you anytime. Thank you for being an integral part of our journey, and we wish you continued success in your future endeavors.

Explore other reviews about Pepper Content

5.0
16 May 2021
Anonymous freelancer
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

it is very great and helpful

Cons

payment is not done on time

2.0
12 Jan 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Writing the actual articles is very straightforward with the briefs they provide. They typically take between 3-5 hours. Payments are "promised" the following pay period. (Expect payment for your work after 5-7 weeks until they have technical difficulties. Then it's anyone's guess and Pepper will pass along their wire fees to you.)

Cons

1) Technical difficulties with payments caused payments to be more than 6 weeks later than promised. Pepper passed on all their wire fees to the contractors and did not pay interest on their late payments. They did not take any responsibility, didn't apologize for missing payments over the holidays, and insinuated that late payments were somehow the writers' fault. 2) Very low pay for the caliber of clients they contract with and quality of work they expect. 3) Unrealistic word count expectations. 4) Miscommunication between client, proofreaders, editors and writers. Editors and proofreaders request changes that are illogical and not aligned with the clients' content or native English practices. 5) Began the contract on the understanding that pay would be per-word -- but they did not pay per word. Instead, they paid a flat rate and insisted on additional words to cover the content of the brief without additional compensation. 6) Does not give any kind of bonus pay for going above and beyond what is asked for with tight turnarounds.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All