employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Philadelphia Insurance Companies

Engaged employer

Great Place to Work - Underwriting Supervisor II Philadelphia Insurance Companies Employee Review

5.0
10 Apr 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people are great Companies say they have an open door policy but at PHLY, they really do. Your voice matters and your concerns are heard..

Cons

Home Office has more opportunities for Volunteering and the field gets jealous. We do not have someone in a field office that has a dedicated position to coordinating so the EAC team has to break out time from their day to figure it out and plan events. While we love it, we do not have the availability to attend all of the events ourselves due to limited hours so sometimes we cannot arrange events.

Explore other reviews about Philadelphia Insurance Companies

5.0
5 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexibility with a hybrid work schedule. Ability to learn more products, so it can be challenging but fun if you are looking for growth. Metrics and everyone knows what to expect which seems to be industry standard across small business.

Cons

None. PTO comparative seems light as you start out.

3.0
9 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Nice people, focus on technology, upper management is usually ahead of insurance trends, immediate supervisors were nice and well meaning. Benefits are good, not great. Good amount of PTO.

Cons

In small business unit, you have monthly quotas and managers are constantly asking how much you are quoting and if you will reach that number. Various levels of punishment if you don’t hit this number. Quality of work, risk selection, accuracy doesn’t really matter, only how much you quote. There is no positive in hitting this number beyond not being bothered until the next month. If you exceed this number consistently, you’ll just be asked to do more. Company is doing everything in its power to save expenses. The pay rate is well below the market. People consistently leave and make much more money elsewhere. Most lower level jobs are being shipped to an Indian company and even the Indian company is having job functions replaced by AI. This is usually at the expense of quality or what our agents actually want. CEOs preach saving expenses and not replacing people, as they show up to your office after flying in a private jet and a car service. Finally, 90% of the people in the region I worked were related to somebody who either works there, were their friends, or were related to agents we did business with. Some of these people had positions made for them, where they sat there and studied for 6 months, instead of promoting people from within. This will also prevent job mobility.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All