Pros
I loved working with my direct managers, they were supportive, sharp, super nice, and highly competent. The team as a whole was smart and collaborative, and it was fulfilling to help sell innovative technologies that genuinely improve quality of life for men after prostate cancer. Unfortunately that’s not enough.
Cons
Leadership is DEEPLY incompetent and disconnected from reality (I often vented with my direct team about this). The CEO, who has personal ties to the product (having undergone the procedure himself), insists on micromanaging and resisting change—even when strategies are clearly failing. Quarterly goals were often unrealistic, and employees were treated as disposable; the CEO doesn’t learn names or acknowledge contributions, regardless of how often you interact with him. The company laid off nearly everyone in 2024, only to rebuild the team in 2025—overpromising on compensation—then began cutting staff again by Q3! Despite constant talk about community and mission, those values are not reflected in how employees are treated. Work was often dismissed or ignored by leadership, and trust in the team’s capabilities was nonexistent. Communication across departments was poor, leading to chaos and inefficiency. PTO is accrued and restricted—you can’t take extended vacations like three consecutive weeks—and there is currently no U.S. maternity leave policy in place. The product is strong and truly benefits patients, but the company running it has zero clear direction or trust in who they hire. Proceed with EXTREME caution, or better yet, don’t even bother. In this org, you are just a number.