Reputation swings both ways - Anonymous employee SPF Architects Employee Review

1.0
1 Feb 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Nice office, great location, interesting projects (if they ever get built while your are there). Adjoining restaurant and art gallery curated by the owner host fun occasional events. Well known firm in Los Angeles, albeit not always for the right reasons but none the less, reputable...

Cons

Zero work-life balance. Owners are well known for being verbally and emotionally abusive. Unless you LOVE building physical, this will be an issue after a few months. Ladies, make sure all your assets are covered if you are stuck in the model shop on Friday afternoons.

Explore other reviews about SPF Architects

5.0
8 Feb 2022
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I've really enjoyed my first few months here. It's a great place for people with a self-starter attitude. You will of course be given tasks to perform, but if you feel there's an opportunity area where you can make an impact, your ideas are welcomed and initiative appreciated. I would highly recommend it to anyone interested in opening up their own practice someday. The culture is not corporate at all which is a big plus for me too.

Cons

There is a high standard of rigor in the design and beyond, which is hard at times but great for your career in the balance.

1
1.0
18 Dec 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Limited positives that do not outweigh the overall experience.

Cons

This was one of the most psychologically damaging work environments I have experienced. The culture lacked basic psychological safety, accountability, and professional boundaries, creating conditions that were deeply harmful rather than merely challenging. Management reacted with public verbal aggression without first seeking to understand workload, responsibilities, or completed work. Performance was never discussed; instead, conclusions were drawn solely based on what an employee was seen doing at a single moment. Profanity was used publicly in reference to professional licensure study (“ARE”), which is widely regarded as a legitimate and serious part of professional development in this field. The language and tone used crossed basic professional boundaries. When clarification could have resolved the situation, direct supervision chose to align with senior management rather than assess the situation from a fair and objective standpoint, reinforcing the accusation instead of providing context. No meaningful support, accountability, or constructive follow-up was offered afterward. The harm caused was not limited to a single incident. The psychological impact of this environment was severe and difficult to recover from, with effects that extended beyond the workplace itself.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All