The truth? It's just another agency. - Recruiter SR2 Employee Review

2.0
19 Aug 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I wanted to share a review as I have seen a couple of review lately which don't really tell a full story as to why they are rated so low. I also wanted to post one real review from a long time employee and not just 5 star reviews employees are asked to do during tenure. I don't want this review to just be negative as that isn't fair and it takes away from some of the truly amazing people in this company and some of the genuine pros of SR2 when compared with other agencies in Bristol. Some genuinely great people work at this agency and I will still recommend individual consultants to people in the market looking for work in the tech space. Some real market experts. Culturally, the business has had its highs and its lows as any business does with growth but the culture was always good across the board. Lots of people I would happily see and spend time with out of work and I do regularly miss the culture and the people I worked with. When we were doing the charity and volunteering work it was very fulfilling. 99% of the people working at SR2 are highly emotionally intelligent / genuinely good people. Good work events and socials. Dogs allowed in the office. Dress down policy. Nice office space, well lit, plants and greenery inside. Team managers and billing managers are great and do the best that they can do between the rock and hard place that is protecting their team and dealing with the CEO.

Cons

In truth, the business is let down by 2 of the 3 founders. I'm not naming names but people who have worked there will know which 2 and I feel like they will know themselves which says a lot. If the shoe fits right? There have been times where it's felt like virtue signal recruitment would be a better name and I have quickly seen the company come back on its own tagline of 'People over Profit' when the profits were dipping. The core values of the business are 'Be a good human, be accountable, don't be a d**head'. They are written on the wall of the office in bold letters but the CEO either didn't read them or doesn't care to uphold himself to the same values expected of his employees. In my time with SR2 I have seen: - People bullied out of the business, including female employees bullied out the business by a fellow female (and Founder) that claim's they want to uplift women in Tech and Recruitment. - One of the founders saying how tough things are financially one day (in front of people making CONSIDERABLY less and maybe genuinely struggling at times) but bragging about how much money they made in one year another day. This was then followed by her being visibly annoyed when one of the best performing consultants (someone who was treated terribly by the CEO because he didn't like him despite the money he made for the business) showed her he had earned more that year. - People belittled, embarrassed, shamed and talked down on by the CEO when they've left and much, much worse. We all remember what he put in that sales meeting! Probably one of the most horrific moments I have witnessed within a professional environment. - One rule for the CEO's favourites and another rule for the rest. Principal consultants blanking for months on end with no action taken but less senior/less favoured employees being put on PIPs in a heartbeat as well as top performers being left out and overlooked purely purely because he didn't like them. - Different rules for founders and employees. For example, there used to be no splits on fees for bringing on clients and no working outside of your vertical UNTIL you're a founder that brings on an account you want all to yourself. The sad thing is there is a lot more I could mention that really isn't aligned with the social responsibility the company preaches. It's a shame because the cons really are driven by 2 of the 3 figureheads of the business whilst the other 99% of the employees and the Third Founder really do care and are genuinely good people who like to help and give back. I can honestly say that some of the best people I have worked with in my life have been at SR2 but also two of the worst, cleverly masquerading as people full of kindness when really they'd throw anyone under the bus if it meant they got a leg up in life. The sad truth is for those 2 founders, the 'social responsibility' has always been an intelligent way to market the business and line their pockets and more people can see that now than they realise.

avatar
SR2 Response
1y
Thank you for taking the time to provide such detailed feedback. It’s evident that you’ve reflected deeply on your experience, and I appreciate the opportunity to engage with your perspective. Feedback like yours is invaluable as it allows us to critically assess our strengths and areas for improvement. First, it’s reassuring to hear that certain aspects of SR2’s culture—such as the camaraderie within the team, the quality of our people and our commitment to charity and volunteering—had a positive impact on your experience. These are foundational to who we are, and we’re glad they resonated with you. However, I want to address some of the concerns you’ve raised, particularly around leadership, the notion of "virtue signalling," and the balance between maintaining a high-performance culture and our "people over profit" ethos. You mentioned that our focus on social responsibility and diversity could be perceived as more about marketing than genuine intent. It’s crucial for me to clarify that our commitment to these areas is far from superficial. Virtue signalling implies empty gestures made for public approval with no action, but our track record tells a different story. SR2 has donated over £250,000 to various charities, a tangible reflection of our dedication to making a real difference. If this was a mere marketing ploy as you suggest, it’s quite an expensive one. Technology Volunteers is entirely pro-bono and has taken hours upon hours of hard work to get it where it is today. That’s taking action and making an impact. This isn’t just about enhancing our brand; it’s about living our values and making a positive impact on the communities we serve. I am sure Young Bristol and Gypanzees with whom you volunteered for whilst at SR2 would agree to name just a few charities we have partnered with and impacted positively in the community. This is central to our identity as a B-Corp-certified company, a certification that demands accountability, transparency, and a true commitment to balancing purpose and profit. Regarding the personal attacks you make on our female founder, I feel it’s important to challenge this criticism head-on. Our founder has played a pivotal role in shaping SR2’s commitment to diversity, inclusion, and social responsibility. While no person or leader is perfect, the characterisation of her efforts as anything less than sincere undermines the significant contributions she has made in fostering a supportive, equitable and high-performance workplace. It’s vital to remember that leadership involves difficult decisions, and personal attacks—especially those that may be rooted in gender bias—do not contribute to a constructive dialogue. I also want to address the balance between maintaining a high-performance culture and our "people over profit" philosophy. We firmly believe in supporting our employees and prioritising their well-being, but we also recognise the importance of performance in sustaining the business. It’s a delicate balancing act—one that requires careful consideration. Performance management, including the implementation of performance improvement plans, is sometimes necessary to address consistent underperformance. This is not about undermining our commitment to people; rather, it’s about ensuring that the business remains viable so that we can continue to support everyone involved. Allowing consistent underperformance to persist unchecked would be negligent, as it could jeopardise the sustainability of the company and, by extension, the jobs of all our employees. The reality is that without profitability, we wouldn’t be able to continue providing the support and opportunities that are central to our mission. It’s not a matter of choosing profit over people; it’s about recognising that the two are interconnected and proving they can go hand in hand. To truly prioritise our people, we must ensure the company remains strong and capable of fulfilling its commitments, both to our employees and to the broader community. If the company made no profit, we would make zero donations to charity for example and, ironically, your mention of virtue-signalling might actually stand up then. In conclusion, I want to thank you again for your feedback. It’s through discussions like these that we can learn, grow, and refine our approach. I wish you all the best in your future endeavours and hope that you find a workplace that aligns perfectly with your goals and values.

Explore other reviews about SR2

2.0
2 Feb 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

the best people to work with

Cons

going downhill dramatically - management is the problem

avatar
SR2 Response
4mo
Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. We’re pleased to hear your positive comments about the team, building an environment with great people and strong values truly matters to us. SR2 is a performance-driven business with clear standards and expectations. We are unapologetic about maintaining a high-performance culture built on hard work, accountability and being a good human. Ownership, contribution and consistent delivery are non-negotiables. That environment isn’t the right fit for everyone, and when there is misalignment between expectations and outcomes, we act fairly, transparently and decisively to protect the wider team and the standards we hold, whilst always ensuring individuals are given appropriate time, clarity and support to succeed. In relation to the comment about the business “going downhill,” January 2026 was the strongest month in SR2’s history, surpassing £1,000,000 in gross profit for the first time. We were 25% up on GP last year and 56% up on revenue, and we remain confident in our trajectory, leadership and long-term strategy. Not everyone will be the right fit for the journey we are on, and that’s okay. We wish you the very best in finding an environment more aligned with your ambitions and working style. Best wishes, SR2
3.0
30 Sept 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I can't speak highly enough of the people that work for the business. London office especially, although from what I can gather every office. The people are second to none, not one person in the London office is a bad person. Training is second-to-none with 2 L&D managers throughout my time there. Both easily accessible, and unbelievably knowledgable. Commission structure is pretty great (up to 40%). Big average fees (especially across European desk). Good brand to work for, and easy to sell into customers. Having a B-CORP status is an unbelievable selling point. Support from team leaders is exceptional. All easily accessible and knowledgable about recruitment, sales, and their markets. Hybrid working policy (3 days in office/2 days at home). Dog friendly office. London office is one of the best office spaces I have been in, with a free gym, showers, and towel service. Lot's of employee perks & incentives.

Cons

The biggest negative is the complete contradiction of the companies founding ideologies. A note I saw in a previous review is 'virtue signalling recruitment', which rings true in this case. In my time there: - WFH Days were revoked due to business performance (for ALL new starters and anyone on review) - HR policy reviews to suit the business - Unrealistic expectation of deal times (despite other employees being nurtured, and putting their first deal through after 8/9 months). I get it. Its recruitment. If profits are slipping and the market is tough, implement changes to better improve success. But to go 180 on the reasons people joined, and to completely go against what you market your business as is unfair. Another noteworthy point is that the business is B-CORP, and markets itself as working in the Tech For Impact sector. Yet, one of their biggest customers creates UAV's and Drones. A reflection of the 'virtue signalling' recruitment.

avatar
SR2 Response
8mo
I really appreciate you taking the time to speak with me recently and for updating your review following that conversation — it was a constructive and respectful chat which I genuinely valued, respect you for and took a lot from. I’m also pleased you highlighted so many positives about SR2 — our people, training, culture, and brand are things we’re immensely proud of. We take feedback seriously — good, bad, or ugly — as it gives us a chance to review, reflect, and improve where we can and where we need to. That said, I do still disagree with some of your remaining points. The adjustments you mentioned to WFH and performance management were never about control, but about giving people the structure, support, and consistency they need to succeed in a tough market. Getting new starters into the office four days a week until they’re fully up to speed, or people on a performance plan in four days instead of three, has already proven to be a really positive move — with new starters making placements faster and people coming off PIPs and back on track within weeks. On your point about some people being nurtured versus you feeling time was limited — I explained the rationale for that. Our approach is highly transparent. If anything, I’d argue we often give people too much time. My view is clear: if someone is working hard, present, proactive, hungry for success, and open to learning, then that’s an us problem to solve, and we’ll invest heavily to help them succeed. The two examples you cited have been given a long runway because of the effort, activity, and willingness they bring every day. We’ll always back people like that — we always have, and we always will. That effort and application is, however, a two-way street. These measures only work when attendance, effort, and engagement are consistent. Unfortunately, in your case — with 16 days’ absence in your first 13 weeks — it became very difficult to provide the same level of development and support that others benefited from. As for your comment about “virtue signalling,” I’d respectfully disagree. You based that assumption on the book People Over Profit, which you confirmed on our call you haven’t actually read. There is a saying "Never judge a book by it's cover" for a reason. You’re not the first — and certainly won’t be the last — to interpret it that way based on the front cover. I do urge you to read it, but even then, I’d caveat that books are subjective; we can read the same one and take entirely different lessons from it. People Over Profit is just that — a book, not the SR2 company handbook. I once read Brian Clough’s autobiography, but I don’t seem to be held accountable to that book in quite the same way as Dale’s. Once read, you’ll find Dale Partridge actually warns that the concept is often misunderstood as People Instead of Profit. He explains that a company driven purely by compassion but unable to fund itself will ultimately fail the very people it’s trying to help — employees, customers, and the community alike. “When a company stops being profitable, it loses the ability to pay its people, support its causes, and fulfil its mission. In the end, everyone loses.” He encourages leaders to hold both principles: care deeply for people while running a financially disciplined business — because profit allows a company to sustain its purpose with integrity. Our Tech for Impact and Clean Energy teams partner with companies using technology to drive sustainability, safety, and social good — including responsible innovators in the UAV and robotics space. Drones are used for a huge variety of purposes and will be a major part of the future of technology for years to come. That remains fully aligned with our values, so I’d respectfully disagree with your throwaway comment there too. I wish you the best in your future career and again appreciate the honest conversation we had. Feedback — even when we don’t fully agree — helps us stay accountable and continue building a business that balances purpose with performance. Best wishes, SR2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All