employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Social & Scientific Systems

Is this your company?

A Sad Caricature of a Once Great Company - Anonymous employee Social & Scientific Systems Employee Review

1.0
9 Jan 2019
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

At its best, the company has a noble mission, strong values.

Cons

Two former CEOs of this once great employee-owned company had a saying they both carried forward over the years: “Our people are our business.” A current member of the SSS executive team has his own saying: “I don’t care about the people, I only care about the business.” Who’s right? Under current “leadership,” new business revenues have spiraled downward and the company’s once-formidable technical staff has disintegrated. In the last few years, all of the business unit VPs, dozens of senior staff, and the cream of the research and analytic staff have left the company. Remaining staff are demoralized, working in a toxic, paranoid environment. The executive team is dysfunctional in the extreme, incompetent and intransigent, a farce of arrogance, inconsistency, half-baked tactics, and complete lack of strategy, with total disregard for the company’s mission and values. The CEO is simply incompetent. He’s risen through the ranks and he’s in way over his head. With no idea how to mitigate his limitations, he’s in effect given the corporate helm to a warmed-over retiree from the defense industry who is nothing more than an old-school bully, a pompous hack, completely void of creativity, with outdated ideas coupled with astounding arrogance and ugly, toxic disrespect for everyone around him. Is it possible that this individual is largely responsible for the downward spiral and the mass exodus the company has witnessed since he took the helm? If you work at SSS, you’re probably already looking for a position elsewhere. Best of luck to you—you’re good and you deserve better than this. If you’re thinking of applying for a position at SSS, think again. It’s a sad, ugly mess, and it’s not getting any better.

Explore other reviews about Social & Scientific Systems

5.0
28 Oct 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Schedule Flexibility, Remote Work, Nice community of co-workers

Cons

Sometimes feels stagnant, I'm not sure I like the work that I do but no indictment on the organization itself

3.0
15 Jan 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

This company can be a good opportunity to pursue a career and make a contribution in public health research. Just don't get hired as a temp! SSS is classified as an "Employee Owned Company". Permanent employees have "employee owner" status and enjoy good benefits including a retirement benefit of company stock given at approximately 4% of salary each year. The executive team is fully focused on increasing stock price and it has risen dramatically in recent years, mostly due to acquisitions. This is especially nice if you have worked at SSS for many years and are nearing retirement (at which point your company stock is cashed-out), as is CEO Jim Lynch. As other reviewers mention, the work environment can be laid-back and friendly, depending on your project and your supervisor. If you're on a well-funded and staffed project, hours are pretty much 9-5 and you may even be able to "work" from home one day a week - Fridays are a favorite for that.

Cons

President Keven Beverly recently described the company's new growth plan in a general staff meeting. He stated a core element of future growth for this employee-owned company will be to increase the use of temporary employees and reduce growth in permanent (aka "employer-owner") staff. It's hard to see how this squares with the ideals - not to mention IRS requirements - of employee ownership.There are talented, dedicated, hard-working staff working as temps at the company, some for many years. That's years of no company health plan, no sick days, no vacations, no retirement contributions, and virtually no raises. Even the benefits manager in HR who hired me was a temp and she had been at the company for two years.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All